tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1496069017254326809.post8020295742201749409..comments2024-03-17T13:20:17.160-07:00Comments on Unknown Gender History: Esther Carlson, Suspected Serial Killer: California, 1931St. Estephehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11524785594106747591noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1496069017254326809.post-30912888030149804942016-07-09T03:57:19.157-07:002016-07-09T03:57:19.157-07:00What "position" are you referencing? No ...What "position" are you referencing? No claim is made that Carlson was a misandrist. There is a claim that the overlooking of 70% of female serial killers is problematic. The title of the blog refers not to each individual historical text that is reproduced. See "A message to 'gender' ideologues.<br /><br />Please read a few hundred more of the forgotten female serial killer cases.St. Estephehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11524785594106747591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1496069017254326809.post-67100422067131703352016-07-09T01:21:46.819-07:002016-07-09T01:21:46.819-07:00misandry? she wasn't killing them for being me...misandry? she wasn't killing them for being men, she was killing them for money. what was she going to do, lure all those nonexistent lesbians in with promises of marriage? if you're going to claim your position as evidence-based, the least you could do is like, you know, not force evidence to fit your argument - that's called confirmation bias and it undermines your credibility. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com