NOTE: Carrie Vandergrift was convicted of poisoning a son
whose illness raised suspicions and resulted in intervention which apparently
saved his life. Circumstantial evidence pointed to the previous suspicions
surrounding the deaths of two husbands which were at the time thought to be
caused by the same poisonous agent which she was known to have purchased in
large quantities.
***
FULL TEXT: Mt. Holly, May 8. – The Vandergrift jury came in
this morning with a verdict of guilty against Mrs. Carrie E. Vandergrift, for
attempting to take her son’s life by means of croton oil. Early this morning it
was rumored that the jury was evenly divided; that they had been balloting all
night long, and that there was no chance of an agreement being reached, but
this was afterwards shown to be false, as they stood 11 to 1 from the start,
and were ready to come in any time after 8 o’clock last night had the court
been present to receive the verdict.
Judge Garrison held himself in readiness to come at once in response
to a telegram should the jury desire further instructions, but he was not
needed, and the verdict was received by the lay judges. Mr. Vandergrift was
pale and defiant as ever. When the names of the jurors were being called she
gazed at each in turn with the utmost calmness, and when each said guilty she
never changed a muscle. But there was an angry expression in her eye that could
not be mistaken. Her counsel, Mr. Hendrickson thereupon made a formal motion
for a new trial, which will be argued later in the term on a day agreed upon by
the court. Mrs. Vandergrift expressed herself as being surprised at the
verdict. She said she felt satisfied it would be not guilty, as she was
innocent of the charge, but she supposed the jury was prejudiced against her.
With Frank Norman, her son, it was different. He came over
in the train from Burlington as soon as the news of the verdict reached there
and went to the jail to condole with his mother. “I thought it would be a conviction,”
he said; “I felt sure if it for several days past. That jury has been
influenced and I know it. I have seen a good deal since I came out here, and I
know the jury has been fixed. They have been prejudiced. The people of Burnlington
are prejudiced.”
[Mrs. Vandergrift Found Guilty. – She Betrays No Emotion at
the Verdict, Satisfactory to Others.” The Philadelphia Inquirer (Pa.), May 9,
1890, p. 2]
***
FULL TEXT: Burlington, N. J., April 18. – “Hang her! Lynch
her!” were the words hurled at Mrs. Carrie E. Vandergrift by an angry mob that
surrounded her residence here when two officers of the court arrested here on a
bench warrant charging her with having attempted to kill her son, Frank C.
Norman, by means of croton oil. She assumed an air of indifference as the crowd
of people assembled in front of her house this morning but her indifference vanished
when she heard the shouts of the mob and saw the angry faces that greeted her
when she opened the door. “I know what you want,” she said to the officers. “You
need not read the warrant. Just wait a few minutes until I go up stairs and
change my clothes and lock the house.”
~ Nothing the matter with Norman. ~
She was permitted to go up alone, and in a few minutes later
came down stairs attired in a handsome black silk dress. By this time she was
again at her ease, and informed the officers that she would take her son with
her. “There’s nothing the matter with him,” she said. “It’s all bosh about him
being poisoned. I am going to take him with me just to show the people that I
am not a murderess.”
~ Followed by an Angry Mob. ~
Norman, however, did not utter a word. He mechanically put
on his hat and coat and ealked unsteadily to the carriage behind his mother. The
crowd was so dense that the police had to forge a passage through it in order
to reach the carriage. Mrs. Vandergrift was threatened repeatedly. She was
deadly pale and glanced nervously behind her as if she expected some assault
from the crowd.
The next instant they started off, followed by the mob
cursing and yelling after her. The horses were put on a run and were soon out
of the reach of the crowd. An hour later Mrs. Vandergrift reached Mount Holly
with her son, and breathed a sigh of relief as she left the vehicle and walked
to the jail.
~ Mrs. Vandergrift’s Statement. ~
She was willing enough to talk and seemed half inclined to
tell her whole story. She said: "This whole thing is an outrage. I never
tried to poison my son and he won't say sow I never gave him hi medicine. He
always took it himself, and when Dr. Hall was prescribing for him he never took
the medicine, but gave the doctor to understand that he did. The whole affair
is a piece of spite work, done because I was about to bring suit against my
late husband's two sons, Peter L. and John Vandegrift, who have opposed me all the time. Frank
Norman, my son, was sick when he came to my house in Burlington. I discharged
Dr. Hall because he was doing my son no good. I do not deny buying croton oil;
that is true. I got five cents' worth on several occasions to use on my corns,
as I can prove by Dr. Rink."
~ Did She Poison Two Husbands? ~
It is now recalled that after the death of Joseph' Vandegrift
during the summer of 1887 Druggist John Butler intimated that croton oil had
caused it, and said he had sold Mrs. Vandegrift more croton oil than he had
previously sold during the many years he had been a druggist. At that time Mr.
Vandegrift's son, Peter, asserted that his father had been poisoned. It is
rumored that Mrs. Vandegrift's first husband also died under
circumstances-similar to the last illness of Mr. Vandegrift. She was the.
latter's third wife, and is charged with having assisted him in getting a
divorce from his second wife that he might marry her. She also had in View a
third husband, and recently told Dr. Gauntt that she was to be married in June
to a wealthy gentleman who was going to take her to Europe on a bridal tour.
~ The Case of Her Son. ~
In the case of her son. Dr. Hall, young Norman's physician,
found that his patient showed symptoms of poisoning, and Mrs. Vandegrift was
watched and was seen to purchase the oil. Once when she asked for the oil some
harmless liquid was given her purposely, and a change for the better was seen
in her son's condition. Prosecutor Budd thinks that her object in attempting to
get rid of her son was to obtain an insurance mortgage of $38,000 which would
revert to her on her son's death.
When arraigned in court the prisoner pleaded not guilty and
was locked up in Mount Holly jail in default of $5,000 bail. It is thought,
however, that she will soon get bail. The trial is down for April 28.
[“Chased By Angry Mobs – The Life of Burlington’s Alleged
Poisoner Threatened. – Charged With Three Offenses. – Mrs. Carrie E.
Vandergrift Indicted for Poisoning Her Son and Accused of Making Way with Two
Husbands – An Alleged Borgia Jailed in New Jersey.” The Evening Leader
(Wilkes-Barre, Pa.), Apr. 18, 1890, p. 1]
***
***
***
***
For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.
***
For more cases of this category, see: Female Serial Killers of 19th Century America
***
[Dec. 30, 2019; 130-12/28/20; 290-7/16/22]
***
No comments:
Post a Comment