FULL TEXT: Pueblo, Col., Mar. 1. – The suit of Mrs. Sarah Prather against Frank Prather for absolute divorce was thrown out of court this morning when it was found that contrary to the laws she had married Prather only three months after obtaining a divorce from her previous husband.
Up to this time the suit had developed considerable warmth
and interest. Mrs. Prather had secured her husband under false pretense. She had
not told him that she had been married three times previously and that
therefore he was only No. 4. The couple were made one Aug. 3, 1901. Husband no.
3, whose name was T. Crudgington had been dropped only three months earlier,
unknown to Prather. What the dates of the previous marriages and divorces were
he has not yet discovered.
~ Thrashed Husbands. ~
The story of the conjugal bliss previous to the filing of
the suit is a sad one. Prather says that his wife was tyrannical and cruel. He
is physically a small man and has never enjoyed good health. The wife is, on
the other hand, big, handsome and strong. She has also two daughters of good
physique. Singly and together he claims, that they would beat him. Sometimes
they did it because he had no money to give them, at other times just for the
mere pleasure of it. Two months ago they put him out of doors after midnight
and he had to seek shelter to keep from freezing. He claims to have been always
patient, to have never lost his temper, and after getting the worst possible
thrashing he would only gently remonstrate. Last summer Mrs. Prather opened a
restaurant. This was the beginning of the end.
She soon fell into the habit, says the husband, of bringing the male waiters
home with her, right into the home he had himself bought, and to show them
preference. In his own presence she made love to them.* when he remonstrated,
and he always did so gently, she alleges, she would forcibly eject him.
~ Spent Night Elsewhere. ~
But one night when she returned after midnight with a man
the long-suffering worm turned. Prather lost his temper and became violent. He
insisted that she would have to give up the company of other men entirely. The
wife, still accompanied by the waiter, thereupon left the house and spent the
night elsewhere. The following morning she swore out a complaint against her
husband for creating a row and had him brought before the police court, where
he was fined because he would not expose his shame and defend himself.
***
* Note: The phase “make love,” at this time, referred to
flirting and other verbally or physically affectionate behavior, to
intercourse.
Thank you so much for this blog. It is such a breath of fresh air seeing someone have an appreciation for the historical aspects of misandry and presenting these stories so that we can show to other people. I've introduced 5 other people to your blog and they all love it so keep up the great work.
ReplyDelete