In 1986, Barbara Hart, one of the central architects of the
notorious VAWA (Violence Against Women Act) expressed, in an introduction to a
book on domestic violence between homosexual women, her disappointment in
finding that such relationships were indeed statistically at the top of the
domestic violence heap. Hart wrote candidly, describing the revelations as
personally “painful,” and stating that the data “challenges our dream of a
Lesbian Utopia. It contradicts our belief in the inherent non-violence of
women.”*
In this brief statement this cultural Marxist, or
“feminist,” delineates two important principles of the feminist plan:
utopianism, a perfect socially engineered system that would serve the ideals of
those who fantasize about it, and, a bedrock a priori position, a “belief,”
specifically a belief that women are inherently not violent beings.
While the passage quoted makes clear that Hart had
discovered both the utopian fantasy and the belief to be unwarranted – and
explicitly contradicted by the facts – she nevertheless plowed forward, along
with fellow travelers in the social engineering industry to construct an
authoritarian agenda backed by the force of Federal power (and in many respects
in violation of the Constitution of the United States), which would be signed
into law by on September 13, 1994, eight years following Hart’s confession that
the facts contradict the theory – or belief – or wish – or fantasy – behind the
entire enterprise.
*[preface to Kerry Lobel, Naming the Violence: Speaking Out About Lesbian Battering, Seal Press, August 1986]
***
INSTRUMENTAL vs. EXPRESSIVE
The professional term for the type of violence that women –
according to the false stereotype – are supposedly incapable of is
“instrumental,” referring to deliberate, premeditated action. ‘Instrumental’ is
opposed to ‘expressive,’ referring to action taken only in a moment of passion or insanity.
Peter Vronsky, in his 2007 book on female serial killers points out and
explains this fallacy of female inability to be calculating, cold-blooded
agents of violence:
“When women
commit violence, the only explanations offered have been that it is either
involuntary, self-defense, the result of mental illness, or hormonal imbalances
inherent with female physiology: postpartum depression, premenstrual syndrome,
and menopause have been included among the named culprits. Women have been perceived
to be capable of committing only reactive or “expressive” violence – an
uncontrollable release of pent-up rage or fear –
and that they murder unwillingly
and without premeditation.
‘Instrumental
violence, however, murder for a purpose – political power, rape, sadistic
pleasure, robbery, or some other base gratification – remains the domain of the
male. After all, every male is a potential killer in the form of a warrior –
and he only becomes a murderer when he misuses his innate physical and socialized
capacity to kill for ignoble, immoral, and impolitic reasons. While the male is
built and programmed to destroy, the female nests, creates, and nurtures. Or so
the story goes.” [Peter Vronsky, Female Serial Killers: How and Why
Women Become Monsters, 2009, Berkley Books, p. 6]
Here is a sample “instrumental violence” case from 1889:
FULL
TEXT: Zanesville, O., Sept. 10.— Frank Amos, one of the most prominent citizens
of Morgan county, was murdered at his home in the western part of this county
by Mrs. Hampton, his niece, who literally hacked his face and head to pieces
with a butcher knife which she had carried for weeks avowedly for that purpose.
Amos was picking berries in the field with his wife when the attack was made.
She and a man who was passing on the road were attracted by his cries of m
ardor and reached him only in time to see him breathe his last and to see Mrs.
Hampton and her daughter run away. The trouble grew out of a law suit in which
the testimony of Amos threw the costs on Hampton.
[“A Woman's Fury, She Hacks a Man
to Pieces With a Butcher Knife.” Galveston Daily News (Tx.), Sep. 17, 1889, p.
2]
***
VAWA, with its enormous budget has, in subsequent decades,
managed to use propaganda and behavioral conditioning programs to quite
literally hypnotize the American public into accepting the “belief in inherent
female non-violence,” despite the copious data contradicting the belief and an
endless stream of gory news stories of vicious female-perpetrated violence.
It is with this fact in mind – the fact of mass delusion, or
mass cognitive dissonance – that The Unknown History of MISANDRY approaches the
question of female-perpetrated violence. Visitors to the site may be perplexed
to see such a large number of stories of violent women whose victims are women,
or girls, or babies of either sex. What has this to do with misandry? It has everything to do with misandry,
actually. These reports of crimes of the past constitute hard evidence – anectodal evidence which because it offers a
wealth of detail gives psychological insight not afforded by statistics – that
may be used to break the spell, the spell caused specifically by misandry (as
well as instinctual chivalry) that causes us to overlook the truth, that causes
us, like sleepwalkers, to accept and even adopt the delusions perpetrated by
the feminist hoax.
***
This particular collection is one of several specialized
categories designed to shed light on female violence in the past, in the era
before cultural Marxism came to the supposed rescue of women as a class being
victimized by men as a class.
It is recommended that the visitor looking into female
violence against victims other than adult men take the time to browse the
following categories (found in the list to the right of the screen) in
particular:
Acid Queens (women
who throw acid into the face of a victim with the intention of ruing the
victim’s looks, but sometimes “accidentally” killing the target)
Child Care Providers
(women who abuse and murder the children they are paid to care after)
Female Serial Killers
Who Liked to Murder Women
Maternal Filicide /
Spousal Revenge Motive
Step-Mothers from Hell
***
***
***
“Our belief in the inherent non-violence of women” leads to
violence against men, women, girls and boys.” The epidemic of attacks on men by
women in Kenya, with 4,600 cases reported in 2011 alone, provides a vivid
example of just how fallacious the heavily financed international campaigns
which single out one sex as blameworthy for the flaw of aggressive violence
really is.
SEE:
[1794-11/23/21]
***
This is really good, thanks for posting. =)
ReplyDelete