FULL TEXT: The French suffragettes are now fighting for the right to be guillotined.
A recent murder trial in which the prosecuting attorney,
when asking for sentence of death for a woman, added that such a verdict was
merely a matter of form, since custom was against allowing women to be
executed, has raised much discussion regarding this question of sex
distinction, and now the foremost feminists are agitating for the “privilege”
of equal punishment with men, regarding this as a step toward their ideals.
A symposium just held by L’Eclair shows that among the
leading upholders of women’s rights the majority of them think that by being
exonerated from death on the scaffold, when they legally deserve it, women are
treated as irresponsible beings, and they protest against this attitude as a
humiliating outrage.
Mme. Aubert, The General Secretary of the French feminist
society, Le Suffrage des Femmes, says:
“Since woman is as competent as man to exercise her rights
and account for her actions, the two sexes should be equal both before the
polling booths and before the guillotine. Not to execute women criminals while
the death penalty exists is sensitiveness of the hypocrite who classes women
with lunatics and despoils them of their rights.”
Says Mme. Dr. Pelletier, the Director of La Suffrageste, the
principal women’s rights newspaper:
“The gallantry of the guillotine is an insult to the
feminine sex, as is gallantry in general.”
“To answer this question,” says the Duchesse d’Uzes, “is
very simple. Crime has no sex.”
Similar views are held by several other prominent
representatives of the woman’s movement. Only two women express the contrary
opinion. Daniel Lesueur, a novelist, says:
“I have never dreamed of demanding the equality of sexes as
far as the guillotine. I do not think that the most furious feminist should
regard as a victory for her theories the fact that one of her sex had her head
cut off. Let us at all events leave old French courtesy a free hand on this
last ground.”
In connection with the death penalty opinion is now
unanimous that public executions should be discontinued. This sentiment is
expressed in an editorial article which has just appeared in Excelsior. The
writer points out that the custom of public guillotinings, far from having the
expected deterrent effect on criminals, has only given condemned men a chance
for making theatrical appeals and teaching embryo assassins who may be gathered
around the scaffold how to die with a swagger and leave behind a reputation for
heroism among their comrades.
“The question,” says the editorial article, “to-day presents
itself with less hypocrisy than formerly. It is no longer a matter of setting
an awful example to the public, but merely getting rid as quickly as possible
of persons whose existence is thought dangerous to society. The operation
should be carried out privately before the Court of Magistrates in charge of
the case, with the jury and a few journalists.”
It is thought that this reform will not be long in coming. [Editors note: And those who thought this were dead wrong.]
[“Women Demanding Guillotine ‘Rights’ – French Feminists Say
It Is Unjust to Deprive Sex of ‘Privilege’ of Execution. – Equal Punishment Is
Asked – Mme. Auclert Calls Custom of Failing to Execute Women ‘the
Sensitiveness of the Hypcrite.’” New York Times (N.Y.), Mar. 16, 1913, p. C3]
No comments:
Post a Comment