Thursday, June 11, 2015

Woman Confesses “I Kill My Kids” – Brave New Ethics


The “I kill my kids!” boast was made and recorded in a video taken at the #BlackLivesMatter anti-abortion protest which took place in Austin, Texas on May 21, 2015 featuring members of Austin Red Guards.

The reference to “killing” is a boast about pre-birth abortion rather than the practice that medical ethics experts have dubbed “after-birth abortion” (a form of termination which is still called “infanticide” outside the most progressive circles of the medical profession).

Youtube video: Woman Confesses "I Kill My Kids"

***

Here is the case of a radical anarchist couple  in Spain from 1908 that involves a similarly proactive approach to eliminating offspring – but not in a manner which was sanctioned by laws on the books.

FULL TEXT: Seville, Spain, April 8. – Suspected of murdering 18 of their own children, the anarchist Molina, and Francesca Herrara, with whom he has lived for 29 years, have been arrested here on a charge of wholesale infanticide.

A mob made a desperate attempt to lynch the couple when they were arrested, and the police saved their lives with the greatest difficulty.

The arrest followed the discovery of fragments of the skeletons of several infants in the house Molina and the woman occupied. A search revealed a small cemetery in the cellar and other graves were found in the garden adjoining. The police think some of the children were even buried alive.

The couple have had 22 children in the 29 years of their residence together, and it is thought only four of them survive.

[“Couple Charged With Wholesale Infanticide,” syndicated (UP), The Pittsburg Press (Pa.), Apr. 8, 1908, p. 1]

***


Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva are experts on medical ethics. They came up with a new idea and published their proposal in the UK-based Journal of Medical Ethics on February 23, 2012. (published by the IME [Institute of Medical Ethics], 152 High Street, Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside WA12 9SG, United Kingdom)

EXCERPT: “We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”

Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva might be book smart, but they truly have no clue. When the work reached a wider audience, it understandably caused outrage and, unfortunately, death threats. Cue the irony. ‘After-birth abortion’: Can they be serious?” Washington Post,  March 5, 2012]

***


EXCERPT: Anecdotal evidence by leaders of prolife groups such as Created Equal and Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust said in interviews that not only do they see more college students willing to say they support post-birth abortion, but some students even suggest children up to 4 or 5-years-old can also be killed, because they are not yet “self aware.” [Mairead McArdle “TRENDING: More college students support post-birth abortion,” (Thomas Aquinas College), The College Fix, Oct. 29, 2014]

***

EXCERPT: A Canadian bioethicist and philosophy professor at Queen's University is lobbying for acceptance of "postnatal abortion" to justify euthanizing newborns with disabilities. [Thaddeus Baklinski “Canadian ethicist advocates ‘post-birth abortion’ for newborns,” Life Site,

***

EXCERPT: During a Florida hearing on a bill that would require that abortionists provide medical care to infants that survive the procedure (Obama would have voted against this one), the legislators were shocked when Alisa LaPolt Snow, a lobbyist on behalf of the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, unashamedly argued against the requirement, insisting that post-birth abortion is a private decision between the mother and her abortionist. [“Planned Parenthood Argues For “Right to Post-Birth Abortion” (Murder?), MrConservative.com, Mar. 2013]

***


For more cases of “Baby Farmers,” professional child care providers who murdered children see The Forgotten Serial Killers.

***

1 comment:

  1. The “windmill attack” in law is a litigation sequence to win unfair benefits (such as money, sole custody, revenge and validation) in the divorce for the malicious spouse by harnessing the coercive power of the state against the target, by tactically exploiting accusations, hostile aggressive parenting, fraudulent litigation, protection orders and forensic reports.

    ReplyDelete