FULL
TEXT: Mascoutah, Ill., Feb. 24—Henry Maul, a farmer residing near Millstadt, had an experience with whitecaps [a vigilante group*] Sunday night, and as a
result he now lies in a precarious condition. His recovery is considered exceedingly
doubtful. Maul has acquired an unenviable reputation as a wife-beater, and has
been repeatedly lined and imprisoned for the offense.
The
punishments administered heretofore appeared to have had no good effect upon
him, and Saturday Maul became angered at his wife and prepared to administer
another beating. The neighbors heard of the trouble, and the to report spread
throughout, the town, and in a very short time a mob of masked men marched to
Maul's residence and took him to the woods, where, he was whipped into
insensibility, after which he was carried home, where he now lies unable to
see, speak or hear. Officers are trying to locate the mob leaders, but as the
sympathy of the community is against the wife-beater it is found a very
difficult matter.
[“A Just Punishment – Wife-Beating Brute
Whipped Almost to Death by Whitecaps.” Evening Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Io.),
Feb. 24, 1896, p. 1]
***
* White caps was a general term used
to refer to several groups operating primarily in southern Indiana in the late
19th century. They became common in the state following the American Civil War
and lasted until the turn of the 20th century. They lynched numerous people; in
all recorded cases, the victims were either criminals or suspected criminals.
hey were known to target alcoholics, people believed to be idle, wife beaters,
and men who did not provide for their families. Such people were often abducted
and flogged. [Wikipedia]
***
►• You have been told that before the rise of feminism in the 1960s that domestic violence against women was tolerated by society as acceptable behavior and was not taken seriously by police and the courts.
►19th Century Intolerance Towards Domestic Violence
► Treatment of Domestic Violence Against Women Before 1960 – this post collects cases classified by the form of punishment or sentencing (whether judicial or through community action)
No, the claim that laws created by males were for the benefit of males is false. Yes, the "Rule of Thumb" myth has been proven to be a marxist-feminist hoax, taking an ancient English common historical notation published in the 18th century and extrapolating it into unsupported claims that 18th and 20th century United States communities, courts and legislatures (laws on the books) were in agreement with the18th century historical notation (Blackstone).
***
►• You have been told that before the rise of feminism in the 1960s that domestic violence against women was tolerated by society as acceptable behavior and was not taken seriously by police and the courts.
You have been lied to. The people who told you these
lies were paid to tell them you. In most cases you paid your own money (taxes
and tuition fees) to be lied to.
Here is one of countless pieces of evidence that demonstrate
the truth.
►•►• To see more eloquent, vivid
evidence proving the lie and giving you the truth, see:
►19th Century Intolerance Towards Domestic Violence
► Treatment of Domestic Violence Against Women Before 1960 – this post collects cases classified by the form of punishment or sentencing (whether judicial or through community action)
No, the claim that laws created by males were for the benefit of males is false. Yes, the "Rule of Thumb" myth has been proven to be a marxist-feminist hoax, taking an ancient English common historical notation published in the 18th century and extrapolating it into unsupported claims that 18th and 20th century United States communities, courts and legislatures (laws on the books) were in agreement with the18th century historical notation (Blackstone).
***
“[O]nly since the 1970s has the criminal justice system
begun to treat domestic violence as a serious crime, not as a private family
matter.”
From the entry: “Domestic Violence” on encyclopedia.com
This claim has been proven to be false.
***
No comments:
Post a Comment