Fallacies about female serial killers continue to be
repeated … endlessly – despite the availability of information which contradicts
the orthodox misandric view of the prevalence and severity of female violence
that is promoted by universities, government and popular culture. Here is a
recent example of wildly inaccurate writing about the topic. The present
example shows how entrenched the stereotype of female innocence
really is – whether it be the result of male
chivalry (stupidity) or Marxist feminism (deliberate fraud).
“Interestingly, female serial
killers are exceptionally rare, and those who are often fall outside of most
profiling schemas. Women tend to know their victims (who are almost always
male), they murder them for material gain, and are often part of a serial
killing team (typically with a man). Notorious examples include Paul Bernardo
and Karla Homolka, and more recently, Terri-Lynne McClintic and Michael
Rafferty (who were mercifully caught before they had a chance to kill more than
► • ► • ► The Contradictory Facts:
Female serial killers are not
exceptionally rare in comparison to male serial killers. The fallacy is due to
the simple fact that very little time has been devoted to the study of female
criminology. This is of course compounded by the dominance of cultural
misandry. Recent research has come up with a list of over 800 cases. Female
serial killer methods and motives are generally different from males, making
the crimes much harder to identify, thus we can be sure that female serial
killers have existed in numbers many, many times greater than can be
represented by historical records.
Female serial killers are usually not part
of a couple, duo or gang.
► It is
true, however that female serial killers usually know their victims. Yet there are a number of cases where female serial killers have stalked and murdered
female victims unknown to them, resulting in large numbers of victims.
a great number of female serial killers do extract money and property from
their acts of murder on men, women, boys, girls and babies, the desire for
godlike power and the sadistic pleasure of watching their victims suffer (most
poisonings are exceedingly painful deaths of fairly extended duration) is
present. The fact is that throughout history there have been very great numbers
of female criminals who have found non-lethal means to defraud, scam, cheat and
rob victims. For example, "alimony racketeering" and the "Heart Balm Racket" are
just as profitable as insurance fraud as practiced by Black Widow Serial
Killers. It is fallacious to assume that financial gain overrides other motives such as sadism, the lust for power, the perverse joy of deception.
► Female serial killers only “fall outside of most profiling
schemas” when you are looking at the schemas designed specifically to profile
the male serial killer. Male serial killer profiles are more useful to law
enforcement professionals than those that identify female serial killers for
the simple reason that female serial killers seldom leave a string of corpses
of obvious homicide victims in their wake. Female serial killers generally
prefer to leave a string of phony
“natural deaths” in their wake. It is rare for there to be a “hunt” for an
active female serial killer since nobody even knows the victims were murdered
until the murderess is later identified due to a usually final murder that
attracts attention. The female repeat murderer is more determined to escape
detection than her male counterpart.
This is what a serial; killer looks like.