Friday, October 6, 2023

Female Serial Killer Ghosts


Female Serial Killer Ghosts


1686 – Mary MacMahon (Máire Rua MacMahon, Red Mary) – Lemenaugh, County Clare, Ireland

1807- Becky Cotton – Edgefield, South Carolina

1820 – Lavinia Fisher (1793-1820) – Charleston, South Carolina, USA

1834 – Delphine Marie LaLaurie – New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

1831 – Rosa (Annie) Palmer – Rose Hall, Montego Bay, Jamaica (reportedly died, 1831)

1908 – Belle Gunness – LaPorte, Indiana, USA

... ghost of Belle Gunness has appeared again with the arrival here of a Minnesota sheriff who refused to reveal his name and who visited the scene of the woman ... [Logansport Pharos Reporter Archives, Apr 30, 1915, p. 7]

Book: Marcus F. Griffin, Extreme Paranormal Investigations: The Blood Farm Horror, the Legend of Primrose Road, and Other Disturbing Hauntings, Llewellyn Publications, Oct. 8, 2011

1924 – Annie Hauptrief – San Marcos, Texas, USA

1928 – Bertha Gifford – Catawissa, Missouri, USA

“Bertha Gifford was the first female serial killer in Missouri. She has been convicted of poisoning at least three people and is suspected of killing several others. Bertha is still being researched by some people today. Her tale has been featured on television and in podcasts. There are also YouTube recordings of ghost investigations and websites dedicated to visitors’ ghost sightings at Bertha’s former hotel and property.” [Liz Dowell, “Bertha Gifford: Missouri’s first female serial killer,” True Crime / Fox 2 Now, Jan. 6, 2023]

1929 – Hattie Stone – Belair, Maryland, USA

Havre de Grace is also home to a ghost with an infamous past. In 1929, Hattie Stone, a resident of Havre de Grace’s Bourbon Street, was accused of poisoning her husband and two sons by feeding them a “good hearty meal with strychnine mixed in,” according to Ryan. One of her sons, George, was a mere 15 years old when he died, she adds. It was rumored that Stone, a Sunday School teacher, orchestrated their deaths for insurance money, Ryan says. She would have been the sole beneficiary in her family.

Stone was put on trial for the murder of George, convicted and served her time. “Her house still stands today on Bourbon Street, and there have been several reported paranormal experiences,” Ryan says.

Guests at the home (now a private residence) have reported having strange dreams, including one of a man who has been seen in spirit form at the residence, Ryan says. “Many still feel the presence of the entire family, and items get moved around the house,” she adds. Alleged haunt: 300 block of Bourbon Street, Havre de Grace. [Kayla Bawroski,”Meet the ghosts of Havre de Grace and the woman telling their stories,” Harford Magazine (Baltimore Sun), Oct 7, 2014]

2005 – Wang Fang – Minquan County, Henan Province, China


Thursday, June 22, 2023

Elizabeth L’Etoile, Massachusetts Acid Queen - 1901


Held In $1,000 – Mrs. L’Etoile Probably Guilty of Mayhem

Her Alleged Victim John Bouchard a Sorry Sight— He is Totally Blind and His Face is Disfigured — He Admitted Being on Friendly Terms With the Woman — He Also Told of Quarrel With Her Husband

FULL TEXT: Mrs. Elizabeth L’Etoile was arraigned in court today on a charge of mayhem. She was found probably guilty, after several witnesses had testified, and was held for $1,600 for the February term of the superior court.

John Bouchard, the alleged victim of the woman’s jealousy, was a sorry sight. He was brought over from St. John’s hospital in a carriage, and was accompanied by his wife,  to whom he was married Sept. 26, and Dr. Robert W. Foster, of the hospital staff. He was led into the court room by Detective Laflamme and given a seat near the witness stand. The man is totally blind, his face is disfigured and his left arm burned. His face and head were swathed in bandages. Mrs. L’Etoile, his assailed assailant, sat in the prisoner’s dock. She was dressed in black, wore a large black had with feather, and white boa around her neck. She rested her in her right hand and covered her eyes with a handkerchief. As Brouchard passed her she saw him through the corner of her eye. During the taking of evidence she listened with the greatest interest to the testimony. Nine witnesses were sworn in for the government.

Brouchard in direct examination testified as follows: “My name is John Brouchard, and on the 25th of November. I visited Mrs. L’Etoile at her home in Herford place. I called at 10:30 a. m. and, Mrs. L’Etoile and her sister were there. I asked Mrs. E’Etoile if she would write a letter for me to come back in the afternoon. I went back in the afternoon to have the letter written. I remained there till about 5 o’clock, when I said I guessed I would go. She said ‘Wait a minute, don’t go in a hurry.” I told her I wanted to go home to supper. She said ‘Wait and I will give you a drink.’ I refused to drink as I already had two drinks. I suppose she wanted me to drink whiskey. She then said ‘Wait a minute,’ and she went into the kitchen and came back with a tin dipper filled with something she threw at me and which I could not see. I ran down stairs and later the ambulance came and I was taken to the hospital, where I have been ever since.”

He denied ever having had trouble with Mrs. L’Etoile but when questioned by Judge Hadley said that when he told Mrs. L’Etoile he was going to be married, she told him that he was foolish to get married.

“When she told you, she would get you a drink, did she say she would get you whiskey?” asked Judge Hadley.

“No, she did not say what she wanted to give me to drink,” answered Bouchard.


Bouchard was subjected to a searching cross-examination by Lawyer Donahue, counsel for the accused. In reply to questions, he said “I have known Mrs. L’Etoile four years and I lived at her house before my marriage.” He admitted being friendly with her and having had his arms around her at different times before his marriage. He also admitted her husband had warned him to keep away from his wife and that on one occasion the husband struck him and kicked him down stairs. He also said that on one occasion Mrs. L’Etoile complained to him that he was acting indecently toward her 10-year-old girl. “My trouble with her husband occurred after my marriage. I met him on the stairs when I was coming from his house and he kicked me. I have been to her house four times since I was remarried. I went there on business for some of my clothing. On the Sunday when the vitriol was thrown at me I went there to have a letter written to my folks. I did not ask my wife to write it because she cannot write French. When I went to her house, I went out to but a half a pint of whiskey.”

“Did you buy whiskey on Sunday in the Highlands?” asked Mrs. Donahue.

“I did. I bought half a pint,” was the answer.

Further questioning, he said: “On that Sunday, I was leaning against the bed in the front room when she threw the vitriol at me. I had my coat off, for it was warm. I do not know whether I had my vest off. I may have taken it odd. I drank two glasses of whiskey that afternoon. In the morning I drank one glass before breakfast.


The next witness called was Robert W. Foster of St. John’s hospital. He said both* the man’s eyes are going and his face disfigured.

The doctor was questioned as to the direction from which the acid came and he thought it came from directly the rear.


Mrs. Bouchard, wife of the complaintant, was next called.

Her testimony was directed mainly to a conversation she had with Mrs. L’Etoile. “She came to my house,” said Mrs. Bouchard, “right after my husband got out the marriage license. She asked me if I was going to marry John Bouchard and I replied yes. She said if I married him I would be sorry as she would have him anyway. She said she could Fix him and that he owed her money and she would have Laflamme arrest him. She said she had him for five years and she would have him even if I married him. She called on me again, the day we were married, I had a talk with my husband and told him she could go see that woman after our marriage, and that I would find no fault and was not jealous. I did not care if he went to see her because he was good to me and I could find no fault.” “If I had whiskey to my house, it’s for you to find out,” she said to Lawyer Donahue. “I want you to understand that I am here for my rights and you want to remember that I must support him while he lives.”


Robert Matthews, who lives under Mrs. L’Etoile, said that he heard Bouchard screaming and went to the door to learn the trouble. Bouchard said his eyes were burned and he took him into his house and put a cloth over his face.


Officer Cawley testified that he was notified of the affair by Mr. Matthews. He went to the house and saw Bouchard. Mrs. L’Etoile was also there. He removed the cloth from Bouchard’s face and asked him who threw the vitriol. He pointed to Mrs. L’Etoile. She said “No. Johnnie. I did not throw it at you. I threw it at some cockroaches.” The officer then reported to the captain, who made the arrest.

The defense put in no evidence. Mrs. L’Etoile was found for the February term of the superior court.

[* Typo in original corrected from “the man’s both eyes”]

[“Held In $1,000 – Mrs. L’Etoile Probably Guilty of Mayhem,” The Lowell Sun (Ma.), Jan. 3, 1901, p. 1]




SEE: “Acid Queens: Women Who Throw Acid” for a collection of synopses of similar cases.

[436-1/30/19; 629-6/22/23]

Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Piroska Jancsó Ladányi, Sexually Sadistic Serial Killer – Hungary, 1954

This case represents an extremely rare “recorded instance”: “Moreover, there is no recorded instance of a female necrophile killing to achieve her goal of a dead and supremely compliant partner, unlike the men who litter the pages of lurid tabloids and academic journals alike. There is no female equivalent of Jeffrey Dahmer or Ed Gein.” [Helen Gavin, “Evil or Insane? The Female Serial Killer and Her Doubly Deviant Femininity,” 2014, Transgressive Womanhood. Inter-disciplinary press, Oxford, pp. 49-60.]


Törökszentmiklós, Hungary – By the age of 14, Piroska Jancsó Ladányi, was servicing occupying Soviet soldiers at the Ladányi farmhouse, as was her mother, receiving miniscule in-kind payments. Her mother had been promiscuous from an early age. Piroska’s story includes incest with a brother and the mutilation of animals.

Piroska’s mother, Borbála, described her daughter as troublesome and abusive to other children: “I always had trouble with Piros because of the kids. Whenever went down the street with her, whichever child was next to her, she would strike in the face or back for no reason. It was all about hitting others, causing others pain. When she stuck a child, she was pleased with herself.”

Piroska also abused animals – from her confession: “I forced the genitals of two cats together. They scratched me, so I tied them together with twine, and I managed to have sex between them in a violent way. After that, I killed them and dissected them, with a particular focus on their genitals.”

Piroska, at the age of 15, persuaded her then six-year-old brother to give her oral “sexual pleasure.” She found confirmation of the method of her experiment she tried with her brother in reading pornographic novels.

~ Public Hysteria ~

There was hysteria in the entire region. Talk of the ages-old Blood Libel – anti-Jewish claims of human sacrifice of gentile children – spread. Another rumor was that Jewish director at a local funeral home was using the hearse to abduct children. Superstitions about the number “13.” – date of the first disappearance and the age of three of the victims – were evoked by some. An inaccurate rumor about an arrest of a suspect attracted a mob of a thousand to the police station. It was the first instance in Hungary of a large agitated mob since the Russian occupation had begun 9 years earlier. This resulted in the Szolnok County police department taking over the case.

~ 5 Murders & 1 Attempted Murder ~

1) Oct. 13, 1953 – Marika Komáromi (11).

On October 13, 1953, Piroska lured Marika Komáromi (11) to the farmhouse, strangled her to death with an electric wire, undressed her, and then, after sitting on her face, she exercised her sexual desires. She pulled dragged the corpse with the help of a rope tied around his neck and threw it into a well-covered with sheet metal on the porch of the house. Piroska was wearing her victim’s shoes when later questioned by police.

2) June 12, 1954 – Piroska Hoppál (13)

On June 12, 1954, Piroska she met Hoppál Piroska (13), who was selling chickens on the market, brought her to the farmhouse, where she strangled her with a wire. Piroka stated: “I looked at the genitals of the corpse, licked it, and then stuck a carrot in my own genitals, and had an orgasm. Then I measured the depth of a broomstick by inserting the end of a broomstick into his genitals. Later, I rubbed my genitals against the dead girl’s protruding tongue, while holding on to the corpse, and climaxed again.” She then threw the body into the well.

3) August 9, 1954 – Irene Simon (17)

On August 9, 1954, Piroka lured Simone Irene (17) to the farmhouse and strangled her with an electric wire and then threw the body into the well. Pirtoka said she was motivated to kill her because she had had several sexual encounters with her and was afraid the secret might be revealed.  The murder took place because she had been sexually established with the girl several times before and was afraid to unravel their secrets. 

4) August 11, 1954 – Marika Botos (13)

On August 11, 1954, Marika Botos (13), had arrived in Törökszentmiklós for a holiday. Piroka met her at the bus stop, and then, with the pretext of helping to carry her luggage, joined her. She persuaded the girl to go with her to the farmhouse, where she strangled her with a cotton cord and then had sex with the corpse before discarding it in the well.

5) August 14, 1954, Katalin Szőke (13)

On August 14, 1954, Piroka lured Katalin Szőke (13) from the vicinity of the railway station. this time Piroka strangled her with a trouser strap, and then engaged in sexual activities with the corpse and threw it into the well. The military (Russian) strap was found on the neck of the fifth victim. Police suppressed this politically dangerous piece of evidence.

6) Sep. 2, 1954 – István Balázsi (21)

On September 2, 1954 István Balázsi went to a field in order to retrieve a bag of clothes left behind during a triste. Piroska saw her and offered her brandy. Balázsi dosed off in the grass. She was awakened by Piroska strangling her with a wire. Mrs. Balázsi fought off her attacker and rushed to the police.

Police questioned her and she immediately admitted the attempted murder. Yet police made no connection between the crime before them and the mystery of the missing girls. Police went with the victim to the field where the attempted strangling murder took place, but the bag of clothes was missing. Then they went the Ladányi farmhouse and searched for the missing bag. In the process, they accidentally discovered a well on the porch that was covered with a metal sheet. In it were found the decaying corpses of the five, now almost unrecognizable, missing girls.

~ Investigation and Cover-up ~

The local police were terrified of occupying Soviet forces. They learned that from a young acquaintance, Ilona Czene, that, on August 27, Piroska, drunk had confessed to Ilona that she had killed 11-year-old Mária Komárom with her mother's help. But Ilona also told police she saw a Russian commander exiting the Ladányi house. The police told Ilona to keep this fact a secret.

~ Multiple Contradictory Confessions ~

Confession 1) Piroska made a full confession, but falsely claimed she had male accomplices. She first said that she had committed the murders with Raffael Józsefné and Irén Simon's suitor, Sándor Fekete, and a Soviet soldier. Police detained the two named individuals, but it soon became clear that they were not in the city at the time the crimes were committed. 

Confession 2) At her second interrogation, Piroska no longer spoke of Raffaelna or Black. She made it clear that the killings were due to Nikolai Bogachov, a Russian soldier.

Confession 3) The following day, Piroska made a new confession that no longer featured Soviet soldiers, but told of her attraction to women. She said this had been felt since the age of 15, triggered by illustrations in a book of pornography she bought at the local market. She cited a picture in which women met their sexual needs with one another and another showing a dog licking a woman’s genitals. Piroska said: "Initially, I gave different stories because I was ashamed to reveal the real reason for my act. That's why I also said that I got the little girls for Russian soldiers and then strangled them so that they would not reveal what happened to them. I was ashamed to admit that I killed the girls because of my perverted sexual desires. I'm still very ashamed of that.”

~ Prosecution: Charges Based on Final Confession as Sole Killer ~

On September 20, 1954, the Szolnok County Prosecutor's Office prepared the indictment against Piroska Jancsó Ladányi and Borbála Jancsó for murder and other crimes.

The rial took place September 29, 1954 in Szolnok, behind closed doors. The court issued an explanatory statement: "According to the investigative data, moral and sexual issues are to be discussed, the disclosure of which would be contrary to the public interest". Only the parents of the murdered girls permitted in the gallery. Two other girls testified that Piroska wanted to cheat on them as well, and other witnesses reported that the Piroska had been selling the clothes of the murdered children. 

The complicity of Piroska’s mother, Borbála Jancsó, was also established.

Piroska Jancsó Ladányi was found guilty and to death and Borbála Jancsó to 2 years and six months in prison.

~ Appeal: New Evidence ~

The judgment was appealed. On October 14, 1954 heard the case. the defendants maintained their previous testimonies. The prosecutor called for a heavier punishment for Borbála Jancsó's responsibility and complicity. Piroska's defender asked for the girl's pardon because the accused was young and had been "raised by the street." Piroska, expressing remorse, requested a lighter sentence. Following a recess Piroska asked to change the confession upon which the original trial was based. She now identified her mother as an active accomplice.

Piroska testified: “The reality is that my mother also knew about my actions. ... In the second case [June 12, 1954 – Piroska Hoppál, 13], mother told me to bring someone from the market who has good clothes and money if possible. For the others, I did it because I needed money and I wanted to satisfy my sexual desire.” She also claimed the victims’ hands and offered the cord to bound them. “No matter how much I earned, my mother wasted everything. She threw away my money in men, confectionery, drinks. I was left completely naked, so I thought about getting clothes for myself. My mother kept pushing for money and prodding me.” The court found the claims plausible because it was thought Piroska lacked the physical strength to commit the murders and move the bodies.

As a result of the new testimony, the verdict was changed: Borbála Jancsó was also sentenced to death. Borbála was, however, granted a commutation by the Presidential Council and given a sentence of life imprisonment. The daughter’s sentence remained unchanged: death by hanging.

~Execution ~

On December 12, 1954 at 10:11 a. m. Piroska was hanged in the courtyard of the Szolnok prison. At 10:22, according to the doctor’s report, her heart had stopped beating. Her body was removed from the gallows 30 minutes later.

Her mother, Borbála, died in prison in the late 1960s.

[Robert St. Estephe, Sep. 9, 2020, based on multiole sources, cited below]



May 1, 1909, Borbála Jancsó; 15 were siblings, 12 of whom died in infancy, two adult sisters committed suicide; parents: János Jancsó, postman; Mária Jancsó, street sweeper.

1917 – János Jancsó, dies.

1925 – Borbála sexually active; bad reputation; shunned by siblings.

Jan. 15, 1934 – Piroska Jancsó Ladányi born in Törökszentmiklós; parents: Borbála Jancsó and Gyula Ladányi.

Aug. 5, 1943 – Piroska 's brother, József born out of wedlock, father Lipót Weisz, denied paternity.

Dec. 25, 1944 – Piroska (10) runs away from home for the first time.

1968 – Borbála and daughter Piroska (14) were prostitutes; home was regarded locally as a brother; receiving small in-kind payments from Soviet occupation soldiers. Piroska treated for venereal disease 3 times.

1949 (?) – Piroska (15) persuades brother, József (6), to give her “oral sexual pleasure.”

1953 – Piroska sentenced to six months in prison for theft; after a month, during the general amnesty, she was released. Two other similar prosecutions occurred later on.

Oct. 13, 1953 – Marika Komáromi (11).

Jun. 12, 1954 – Piroska Hoppál (13).

Aug. 9, 1954 – Irén Simon (17).

Aug. 11, 1954 – Mária Botos (13).

Aug. 14, 1954 – Katalin Szőke (13).

Date? 1954 – Piroska sells victims’ clothing at the junk market, she receiving 15-20 forints each item(?). Piropka Hoppál coat, shirt and sandals brought Piroska 45 forints.

Aug. 27, 1954 – later witness Ilona Czene reports that Piroska, drunk, confessed on Aug. 27 to her that she had killed 11-year-old Mária Komárom with her mother's help. She mentions seeing a Russian commander exit the Ladányi house. Police are afraid of Russians, so they tell Ilona to keep facts secret.

Sep. 2, 1954 – attempted murder of Mrs. István Balázsi (21) (Mrs. István Balázs).

Oct. 14, 1954 – Barely two weeks after the first-instance verdict, case was heard by the Supreme Court.

Sep. 20, 1954 – Szolnok County Prosecutor's Office prepares the indictment against Piroska Jancsó Ladányi and Borbála Jancsó for murder and other crimes.

Sep. 29, 1954 – trial; Szolnok, behind closed doors; "according to the investigative data, moral and sexual issues are discussed, the disclosure of which would be contrary to the public interest". Piroska Jancsó Ladányi sentenced to death; Borbála Jancsó sentenced to 2 years and six months in prison.

Oct. 1954 – appeal; As a result, the verdict also changed: Borbála Jancsó was also sentenced to death, and she is not sent to gallows just because in her case the Presidential Council exercised her right to pardon and changed the woman's sentence to life imprisonment; sent to Kalocsa prison.

Oct. 1954 – Piroska, in last testimony before the Supreme Court, states that her mother knew about his actions. 

Dec. 12, 1954 – hanged in the courtyard of the Szolnok prison.

Late 1960s – Borbála Jancsó dies in the Zalaegerszeg prison hospital.



[N. Nagy Zoltán, “Öt holttest a kútban - Jancsó Ladányi Piroska rémtörténete,” (Five corpses in the well - the horror story of Piroska Ladányi Jancsó”), Egyperces Krimi, Nov.14. 2015]

[Legat Tibor, 3 articles, “Jancsó Piroska rémtörténete” (“Horror story of Piroska Jancsó”), Aug. 8-10, 2017 – 1) Legat Tibor, “Halálkút (Jancsó Piroska rémtörténete )” (“Death Well (The Horror Story of Piroska Jancsó)”), Szemtol Szembe. Aug. 10, 2017. 2) Legat Tibor, “Piroskával mindég baj volt” (Jancsó Piroska rémtörténete); (“There was always something wrong with Piroska” (Horror story of Piroska Jancsó)), Szemtol Szembe, Aug. 9, 2017. 3) Legat Tibor, “A népköztársaság nevében (Jancsó Piroska rémtörténete),” (“On behalf of the People's Republic” (Horror story of Piroska Jancsó)), Szemtol Szembe, Aug. 8, 2017.]

[“Öt lányt gyilkolt a törökszentmiklósi kéjgyilkos,” (“Five Girls Were Killed By The Comfort Killer In Törökszentmiklós”), Magyar Noir, Jul. 6, 2016]

[N. Nagy Zoltán, “Öt holttest a kútban, Közzétéve március,” Mar. 29, 2019]

[Hungarian Wikipedia, “Jancsó Ladányi Piroska”]


BOOK: Rubin Szilárd: Aprószentek (“Little Saints”), October 2012 by Magvető Könyvkiadó, Budapest




















More cases: Female Serial Killers Executed


[17,218-2/22/22; 21,468-7/3/23]