Saturday, May 1, 2021

Early Men’s Rights Activism


1890s   New York Alimony Club (informal)
1896    Anti-Bardell Bachelor Band, Atlanta Georgia. Formed to fight against a national campaign headed by activist Charlotte Smith (Women’s Rescue League) to promote a tax on bachelors. Another, similar effort was made by the Hoboken Bachelor’s Club in Hoboken, New Jersey.

1898    League for Men’s Rights, London, England – William Austin
1908    E. Belfort Bax, England, major political writer who called feminism a fraud and discussed “female privilege.”

1911    Anti-Alimony Association, New York.

1912   George Esterling – Denver, Colorado.

1925   Samuel Reid, “Alimony Sam,” the “alimony martyr” of California.

1926    Bund für Männerrechte, Vienna, founded by Sigurd von Hoeberth (Höberth)  and Leopold Kornblüh in March 1926. In January 1927 the Bund split into two organizations circa: Aequitas (Hoeberth), Justicia (Kornblueh); journal “Self-Defense.”

1926    Themisverbandes (Men’s Rights organization for female members, Sigurd Höberth von Schwarzthal). The founding of this organization led to a schism in Bund January.

1927    Aequitas Weltbund für Männerrechte (Aequitas Word Federation for Men’s Rights) (international), Vienna, following a schism in Bund für Männerrechte (Federation for Men’s Rights). This was Sigurd Hoeberth’s new organization for men’s rights which welcomed female members.

1927    Justitia Verein für Männer und Familienrecht (Justitia Society for Men’s Rights and Family Rights), Vienna, founded by  Leopold Kornblüh following a schism in Bund für Männerrechte (Federation for Men’s Rights). This group did not allow female members.

1927    Alimony Club of Illinois, Society of Disgruntled Alimony Payers, Chicago, founded by Dr. Vernon B. Cooley and second wife, Mrs. Bessie Cooley.

1927    Alimony Payers Protective Association, led by Robert Gilbert Ecob.

1927    Milwaukee Alimony Club, Wisconsin.

1927    Fifty-Fifty League, London; manifesto “The Sex War;” led by John MacArthur.

1928    Tibet Men’s Rights organization (name of org. unknown), founded by Amouki.

1929    World’s League for the Rights of Men, United Kingdom section, founded by  Geoffrey Kimber, London.

1930    D. A. M. Association, Kansas City, Missouri, founded by French L. Nelson.

1930    National Sociological League, Dr. Alexander Dallek, executive secretary (another link).
           
1932    Alimony Club of New York County (Adolph Wodiska) (cited Jan. 9, 1932).

1932    Ohio Alimony Association, Cleveland, Ohio.

1933    National Divorce Reform League, Theodore Apstein (cited Feb. 14, 1933).

1935    Alimony Reform League, New York.

***

***

►• CHRONOLOGY of Established Organizations

1926 – May 27 (?) – Bund für Menschenrechte – Vienna, Austria – (split into 2 organizations: Equitas & Justicia) – Sigurd Hoeberth

1928 – Aequitas (Equitas) – Vienna, Austria – (from schism of Bund, members of both sexes) – Sigurd Hoeberth

1928 – Justicia – Vienna, Austria – (from schism of Bund, restricted to male members) – Joseph Kornblueh

1927 – May 13 (incorporated) – American Alimony Payers Association – New York City – Robert Gilbert Ecob

1927 – Jun. 2 (founded) – Alimony Club of Illinois – Chicago – Vernon Cooley

1927 – Sep. 12 (founded) – Milwaukee Alimony Club –  Wisconsin – Dr. H. W. Taylor,

1927 – Fifty-Fifty – London, England – John MacArthur

1928 – Name of organization unknown – Tibet – Amouki

1930 – National Sociological League – New York City – Dr. Alexander Dallek

1932 – National Divorce Reform League – New York City – Theodore E. Apstein

1935 – Alimony Reform League of New York – Jack Anthony

1960 – Divorce Racket Busters (incorporated 1961 as U.S.A. Divorce Reform, Inc.) – California – Reuben Kidd

1961 – Nov. 20 (incorporated) – U.S.A. Divorce Reform, Inc. – California – Reuben Kidd

***
[1310-8/22/18]
***

“Militant Wife Launches War Against Alimony in Chicago” - 1927

NOTE: This post will be “in progress” for a while since there is an enormous amount of text to be transcribed before being posted. This is a particularly important post since its subject, the Alimony Club of Illinois, represents the first formally established anti-alimony organization in the US. At this stage in my research, I regard this as the first, if prototypical, formally established Men's Rights organization in the US.

The story of its founders, Dr. and Mrs. Vernon P. Cooley, is of particular interest. As Dr. Cooley fought against his gold-digging wife in Chicago court, he was inspired to organize the men sitting in jail for non-payment of alimony into a formal lobby for reform. Shortly after announcing his plan to the newspapers, he received a letter threatening to bomb his home if he did not drop his court actions against his ex-wife.

It is important to note that anti-alimony was not regarded as anti-child support (even though many jurisdictions used “alimony” judgments to cover child support as well as gold-digger support). The Alimony Club of Illinois did indeed extend assistance to ex-wives who were attempting to collect child support from ex-husbands.

***

TIMELINE (in progress)

Jun. 13, ’27 – Dr. Cooley’s ex, Margaret, wins alimony suit despite having been found guilty of immorality and drunkenness.

Jun. 15, ’27 – Dr. Cooley issues a “call to arms” to alimony payers, especially those incarcerated in debtor’s jail, to get organized to fight alimony oppression.

Jun. 26, ’27 – Dr. Cooley is quoted in Chicago Tribune calling for the “formation of an association of disgruntled alimony papers.”

Jun. 28?, ’27 – Dr. Cooley receives a bomb threat in the mail, demanding he stop court action against his ex-wife. The letter threatens Cooley’s attorney Frank Johnston as well. Johnston had been an Illinois Appellate Judge before returning to private practice.

Jul. 7, ’27 – Dr. Cooley’s ex-wife remarries.

Jul. 20, ’27 – meeting held at High Noon Club to begin formal organization of the Alimony Club of Illinois.

Aug. 2?, ’27 – Office of the Alimony Club of Illinois opens at 189 West Madison Street.

Aug. 3?, ’27 – Plan for Alimony Club of Illinois are drafted in “secret session.”

Aug. 15, ’27 – Contempt of court charge against Alimony Club of Illinois.

***

ARTICLES to be added:

[“Calls Alimony Clubmen To Fight His Gay Ex-Wife – Dr. Cooley Resents Her Court Victory.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jun. 15, 1927, p. 19]

[“Doctor Battling Alimony Gets Bomb Threat,” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jun. 28, 1927, p. 1]

[“Courts Blamed For Mixup Over Alimony Digging – Law Gives Judges Sole Power, Attorney Says.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jun. 29, 1927, p. 15]

[“Alimony Club Is Born To War On Gold Digging – Recruits Report Tales of Fraud.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jul. 21, 1927, p. 1]

[Genevieve Forbes Herrick, “Ex-Wife Wed; Foe of Alimony Is Un-Clubbed,” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jul. 8, 1927, p. 1]

[“Alimony Club Is Born To War On Gold Digging – Recruits Report with Tales of Fraud.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jul. 21, 1927, p. 1] (very long)

[Cooley Alimony Case Again Aired In Court Today,” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Aug. 2, 1927, p. 3]

[“Alimony Club Will Draft Plans Tonight In Secret Session,” Chicago Tribune (Il), Aug. 3, 1927, p. 12]

[“Alimony Club Challenged in Contempt Case – Told Husband to Disobey Court, Wife Says.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Aug. 16, 1927, p. 17]

[“Alimony Club Outlines War on Gold Diggers – Fake Detectives, Crooked Lawyers Also Targets.” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Aug. 24, 1927, p. 21]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 5): With the alimony problem becoming a question of the hour among judges, the clergy, and many citizens, a new sensation developed yesterday when Dr. Vernon P. Cooley, whose alimony case started the discussion, received an anonymous letter, printed in a feminine head, threatening to bomb his home.

Dr. Cooley has announced a finish a finish fight in the courts against “gold-digger” wives, who view marriage simply as an aid to alimony. Frank Johnston Jr., until recently a judge of the Appellate court, has promised to present the case for Dr. Cooley to the Illinois Supreme court.

~ Letter Threatens Bombing. ~

“You and Johnston better let well enough alone unless you and your present wife want to be exposed,” the letter stated. “And what’s more your home will be bombed when you least expect it. Take warning. One Who Knows. Johnston will get his share too.” The letter was given to federal authorities.

While Dr. Cooley and his present wife, Mrs. Bessie Cooley, expressed a determination to proceed with their plans to form an association of alimony victims, and to present a strong demand for consideration in the courts. Chief Justice Joseph Sabath of the Superior court, who has heard 25,000 divorce cases – more than any other judge in the world – revealed his knowledge of the women he labeled the “alimony adventuress.”

“I have known women to come into my court who were receiving alimony from three husbands, Judge Sabath said. “There have been many cases where two husbands were paying.”

~ Tells of Deception. ~

“Of course, the laws specifies that when a divorced woman remarries, her alimony from the former husband ceases at once. But these women deceived their former mates, and continued to collect – extort would be a better word – from them. When we learn of such cases, the courts make short shrift of these adventuresses.

“This same type of woman lures men into marriage often just for the purpose of making them pay alimony. Bringing all their attractions into play, the trap the fat and jolly and prospering gentry into marriage, and immediately their attractions fade into cold disdain. Soon the husband sees his mistake, and then he’s compelled to pay alimony.

~ Stay Single to Collect. ~

“Unless they set a better prospect, these women – I have had any number of them before me demanding alimony – stay single, and for years they live, riotously and often immorality, on this deliberately gotten bounty.

“And our upper courts have held that no matter how depraved these women become, the alimony must go on, with the ex-husband paying for the liquor, the gigolos, and the love nest.”

Superior Judge Harry A. Lewis had an alimony seeking women before him yesterday and urged her to free her husband with a divorce or become reconciled with him. The wife, Mrs. Belle Glicksman, had sued for separate maintenance, demanding support from Aaron Glicksman, who owns a leather shop at 2223 Montrose boulevard.

~ Leading Men to Sin. ~

“Why should you hang on this man’s neck the rest of his life?” the judge demanded. “You want his money, but you don’t want to live with him. Man’s natural instincts move him to mate, and you are deliberately heading him to sin by your refusal to free him. Court can’t make a man virtuous.”

[“Doctor Battling Alimony Gets Bomb Threat,” Chicago Tribune (Il.), Jun. 28, 1927, p. 1]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 5): Chicago, July 12—A modern Joan Arc has risen here in the person of one Mrs. Bessie Cooley, and round her standards are gathering recruits from Chicago’s pretty badly defeated army of alimony payers.

Her cry is: “Down with alimony gold-digging.” “Millions for defense, but not one cent for alimony,” the heartened troops under her command are singing as a march song. Mrs. Cooley is the wife of Dr. Vernon P. Cooley. Cooley was married once before and the first wife is still receiving alimony, which makes the present militant Mrs. Cooley angry.

The Illinois appellate court recently ruled on Dr. Cooley's petition to have the alimony to the first Mrs. Cooley stopped. The court supported his contention that Mrs. Cooley No. 1 was spending the money he was paying her in riotous living, but that fact, so the court ruled, as a mere moral issue, did not warrant any order for the discontinuance of payments.

It was a long legal treatise on morality and alimony. And the upshot of the whole thing was that Dr. Cooley was ordered to keep paying and probably would have done so if it hadn't been for Mrs. Cooley No. 2.

“No, sir,” she said. “Let them put you in jail. But don't pay another cent. No woman without children, who is able to support herself, is, deserving of alimony.

“If while she is living with him and is still his wife, a woman, conducts herself in an improper, manner, a husband can go into court and rid himself of her completely.”

“But if after she divorces him and lives riotously, on the alimony he is forced to pay her, it is irreconcilable that his duty to her should be greater than while he is married to her.

“The two theories don’t harmonize. There are too many gold-diggers among divorced women, and half of them aren't deserving of consideration.”

~ FORMS ANTI-ALIMONY LEAGUE ~

As the first part of her drive Mrs. Cooley is forming the Society of Disgruntled Alimony Payers.

Eligibility to membership will be based on experience only.

A big mass meeting of members is being planned and will take place here just as soon as the society can whip its battle plans into shape. Many Chicago judges agree with Mrs. Cooley that there is need for a movement such as she has set in motion.

They concur that alimony, to healthy and able-bodied ex-wives without children is as out of date in the changed order of social conditions as a horse and buggy.

[Gibbons, Roy J., “Militant Wife Launches War Against Alimony in Chicago,” syndicated (NEA), Freeport Journal-Standard (Il.), Jul. 8, 1927, p. 13]

***

 

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 5): Chicago, July 20 – The alimony club, refuge of the solace-seeking male, meets tonight and portends ill for the gold-digging ertswhile wife.

Statistics of women putting poison in their husband’s coffee and then running away or filing suit for divorce, while the victim is in the hospital, will be related at the dinner for those daring enough to appear.

Letters written by men who are shy about hanging their family troubles on a public line will be heard, says Dr. Vernon P. Cooley was relieved of paying alimony when his wife revealed she had married an older man months ago.

“One of our members, who will be at the dinner,” said the doctor, “is paying alimony under a court order to a bigamous woman who already has had him thrown in jail once when he fell behind in his contributions.

[“Alimony Payers to Seek Refuge at Club Dinner,” syndicated (AP), Jul. 21, 1927, p. 1]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 4 of 5): Chicago – Married women who are gold-diggers rather than wives, are facing bitter opposition from the newly formed Chicago Alimony club, founded by Vernon P. Cooley, a Chicago dentist, who has been through the alimony mill himself. His organization is actively engaged on a campaign to amend divorce laws in such a manner as to afford proper protection to wives who are victims of circumstances, while at the same time clipping the wings of those matrimonial birds of passage who go through the marriage ceremony with one eye on the divorce court and an income for which they will not have to work.

It will be a fight, too. Cooley Alimony club was emblazoned across the front pages a year ago when he announced his determination to oppose alimony graft. Recently, as his organization began its active campaign, he received an anonymous letter.

“Cooley, you lay off, or you will suffer,” the letter read.

As a reply the militant anti-alimonist called a meeting of the Chicago Alimony club, at which he said plans will be completed for a final drive for a revision of existing divorce laws, and the exposure of scores of outstanding cases of ex-husbands who had been bankrupted by their efforts to appease the voracious appetites of gold-digging women, backed by the power of a court order.

Cooley was divorced from his first wife a year ago. Heavy alimony was charged against him. Ever since that time he has been waging his fight, in which he is supported by his second wife, Mrs. Besse Cooley.

[Hargis Earlywine, “Threaten Leader in Warfare Against Alimony Graft,” The Shamokin Dispatch (Pa.), Jul. 9, 1927, p. 2]

***

 

FULL TEXT (Article 5 of 5): Chicago, Aug. 12. – Why the alimony club?

To stop the indiscriminate awarding of alimony to gold-digging parasitic women.

The Alimony club of Illinois was created for the purpose of preserving the American home from disintegration, the abolition of legalized white slavery, the prevention of fraud and perjury and to eliminate forever the imprisonment of men for non-payment of alimony to conscienceless, vindictive wives who apparently delight in the prosecution an humiliation of “The goose that laid the golden egg.”

Because there apparently exists in Chicago no organization founded for humanitarian purposes, to which those wishing help and advice might turn with some assurance of immediate and concrete help, the creation of such an organization as this was imperative.

Primarily the intent of the law with reference to alimony was to reward a faithful, loving wife who had done her duty to her home and family.

How far we have retrograded from the original purpose of this beneficent law may be gleaned from the fact that today the securing of alimony is a highly specialized, vicious industry, made possible by an alliance between perjurers, unscrupulous attorneys and politicians.

Does a man, after divorce, owe his wife a greater duty than while the marital relations existed, in that she may commit with impunity low and degraded, be guilty of improper friendship with other men, and still receive alimony? You cannot reconcile these two ideas.

This club is to save ex-husbands from the persecution of such women.

[Dr. Vernon P. Cooley, “Purpose of Alimony Club Is Outlined by Dr. Cooley,” St. Petersburg (Fl.), Aug. 13, 1927, p. 9]

***

***

***

***


***


***

 

***

***

***

***

***

***

 
 
For more revelations of this suppressed history, see The Alimony Racket: Checklist of Posts 
 
***

Robin Murphy, 17-Year-Old Cult Serial Killer – Massachusetts, 1980

FULL TEXT: Fitchburg, Mass. – The state’s star witness against an accused devil-worshiping cult leader and pimp testified Tuesday she took part in the ritualistic killing of a Fall River prostitute in a trance-like state.

The defendant, Carl Drew, 25, headed a satanist cult among prostitutes and pimps in the Fall River area, according to testimony in the Worcester Superior Court trial now in its second week.

Drew is on trial for murdering Karen Marsden, in early 1980 and has been indicted in the late 1979 killing of Doreen Levesque, 19, of New Bedford. Both young prostitutes were believed involved in the cult.

Miss Marsden was beaten to death with a rock before her throat was slit, her body mutilated her neck in a swampy woodland in Westport in February 1980.

Witness Robin Murphy, 17, who Monday testified she was present during the murders of the two woman and a third prostitute, said Tuesday she participated in Miss Marsden’s murder while in a trance-like state.

Defense Attorney John Burknis asked Miss Murphy if her state of mind was similar to that she described when she said she attended cult meetings led by Drew during which she experienced “out of body” sensations.

“I wouldn’t do anything like that to Karen,” Miss Murphy told her the crowded courtroom. “I loved her. I did it, yes, but not because I wanted to.”

Carol Fletcher, 24, of Fall River, said she was present during the killing, but did not participate. She said she saw Drew “take something out of his pocket, but I looked away. I went back to the car.”

Miss Fletcher recently returned from Washington State where she fled after giving information about the case in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

The defense introduced a letter allegedly written to a female lover by Miss Murphy from Framingham State Prison, where she has been serving time since pleading guilty to second degree murder in the case in exchange for turning state’s evidence.

In the letter, Miss Murphy complained about the information given to police by Miss Fletcher and contradicted some her own testimony.

“She’s (Miss Fletcher) saying everything. She’s trying to get Carl and me life in prison,” Miss Murphy wrote. “I don’t care what Carl has ever done, she doesn’t have to lie about him.

“If she lies on the stand, that’s perjury. That’s five years, she’ll be taken care of if she gets up here (to Framington prison). Everybody up here hates a rat,” the letter said.

“Carol worked for me and she’s {angry) because I wouldn’t take her to bed,” Miss Murphy wrote. “She’s saying that Carl belongs to a satanic cult. That’s bull---.”

Miss Murphy testified Monday [Mar. 9, 1981] that Drew broke Miss Marsden’s neck, ordered her to slit the woman’s throat, then tore the head from the body with his bare hands.

After the murder, Miss Murphy said she went to Miss Fletcher’s home where she “ate some chicken, drank a beer and smoked a joint.” 

[“Star witness admits her role in satanist slaying of hooker,” Billings Gazette (Mt.), Mar. 11, 1981, P. 9-A]

***

Officer Paul Carey: I thought it was a bad move to grant Murphy immunity. …But I still believe that Murphy was the real ringleader, not Drew; that Levesque was murdered because Murphy was also in love with her and became jealous when Levesque started seeing Drew. I believe Murphy and Marsden were present when Levesque was killed. [Paul Carey, “Undercover in a murderous cult,” March 23, 1999]

***

Article written by one of the investigating officers –

FALL RIVER, Mass. – It was a case of sex, slaughter and Satanism. One woman was beheaded. Two others had their skulls crushed. Crime scenes were littered with human as well as animal bones.

It all began in October 1979 with a dead body beneath the bleachers of a vocational high school here. We ID'd the corpse as Doreen Levesque, a runaway from a foster home in New Bedford. She had been working as a prostitute in Fall River's red-light district.

It was the weirdest multiple-murder case I ever saw as a detective sergeant in the Fall River Police Department. Not only did I go undercover to attend a Satan worship ritual, I even brought the beer.

~ Hands bound, skull crushed ~

The young woman's hands had been bound behind her back; her head had been caved in with a rock. There were signs of peculiar sexual activities.

We had no suspects. There was no clear motive. We were stumped.

Three months later, another woman's body turned up. This one was found in a wooded area behind a local printing plant. She was identified as Barbara Raposa, 22. Like the first victim, her skull had been crushed with a rock and her hands bound behind her back. The slaying had ritualistic overtones to it. Three months before her body was found, Raposa -- also a prostitute -- was reported missing by her boyfriend, Andre Maltais, 44, of New Bedford.

We interviewed Maltais. He told us that the second dead woman was a devil worshiper. We later discovered that Maltais was part of the same devil worship group that held some of its rituals in the area.

We also stumbled on another relevant name: Robin Murphy, a 17-year-old prostitute and pimp who was a former girlfriend of Maltais. We learned that Maltais had ended a long-running relationship with Murphy in order to become Raposa's lover.

~ “Hovering” over crime scene? ~

Maltais told investigators that he had a dream of hovering over the crime scene where Raposa's body was found.

Apparently, he saw or remembered too much while he was “hovering.” The district attorney had him arrested, charging him with Raposa's murder. When she was questioned, Murphy fingered Maltais as Raposa's killer and agreed to turn state's evidence in return for a lighter sentence.

But there was still the killing of Levesque to solve.

We had long heard there were satanic rituals taking place in the area, but never had cause to investigate. Then, a woman I had helped years ago told me that a satanic group periodically met at her apartment. More importantly, she told me that Raposa, Murphy and a man identified as

Carl Drew, 25, all came to satanic rites there.

I told my partner, "Let's go. We're going to meet Satan."

~ Six-packs and Satan ~

We got two six-packs of beer and went to the apartment. We didn't tell anyone we were cops. People started arriving including Drew, a known pimp, and Murphy. They were soon joined by a woman named Karen Marsden -- who would later end up the third victim in the satanic slaying cluster.

At the apartment, we watched a satanic ritual. There were strange chants. A "Hail, Satan!" announcement indicated that Satan had entered the room.

~ Pimps and prostitutes ~

We later found out that Drew had been pimping for Levesque, the first victim, at the time she was murdered and that Murphy was pimping for Marsden. It was an ugly tangle, but we always thought Marsden, 20, was the key.

We later interviewed her about the murders of Levesque and Raposa. She was nervous and cried. We started to believe that she might have been at the scene when the murders occurred. She wouldn't admit that she took part in or saw anything.

I was supposed to meet and interview her again weeks later. But she disappeared.

I knew she was dead. Human skull and animal bones

Marsden's skull was found about six months later in Westport. When we searched the area, we found cat skulls, sheep bones and some jewelry that belonged to Marsden. We also found large clumps of hair -- ripped out by the roots -- that we believe were from her head.

More of Marsden's possessions were found about a half-mile away. We also found a ring with the symbol of the devil on it. It was spooky.

~ Maltais gets life ~

When Maltais went on trial for Raposa's murder, Murphy was the prosecution's key witness. She convinced the DA to grant her immunity in exchange for her testimony that she was present at the slaying of Raposa and had participated in the Marsden murder.

I thought it was a bad move to grant Murphy immunity. I still believe that she was the ringleader behind all the slayings.

In the Marsden killing, Murphy's testimony painted a grisly scene. She said Drew ordered Marsden killed in a nighttime ritual because the young woman wanted to leave the cult. She said Drew also killed Levesque and that "the two girls' souls were offered up to Satan."

Drew, she testified, ordered her to cut Marsden's throat after he crushed the victim's skull with a rock. She said Drew whispered words in a strange language, used blood from the body to paint a cross on her forehead, and then wrenched the head from the body with his bare hands.

Murphy told the jury that Drew had called himself the "son of Satan." Murphy admitted that Raposa, the second victim, was her lover and was involved with her in a prostitution ring.

Maltais continuously denied that he murdered Raposa or was involved in a devil cult. However, he was convicted of Raposa's murder in March 1981 and sentenced to life in prison. Murphy, in exchange for her testimony, was given 15 years in prison after pleading guilty to second-degree murder.

~ Overlapping love triangles ~

But I still believe that Murphy was the real ringleader, not Drew; that Levesque was murdered because Murphy was also in love with her and became jealous when Levesque started seeing Drew. I believe Murphy and Marsden were present when Levesque was killed.

I think Murphy killed Raposa because Raposa was in love with Maltais. Murphy admitted that she and Raposa had previously been lovers.

And, I believe Murphy killed Marsden because of the two previous murders. Marsden was at the scene of those murders, and I believe Murphy knew she was the weak link and might get them convicted.

Also, Murphy later admitted during the Levesque investigation that she lied in naming two other men as Levesque's killers. She later told the DA that she didn't even know the men she had accused. The DA was then forced to release the men.

No one was ever prosecuted for the murder of Levesque.

~ Where are they now? ~

Maltais died in prison, thinking he was an "agent for the police." He was mentally ill.

I visited Drew in prison a few weeks ago. I am convinced that it was Murphy, not Drew, who ran the whole cult and prostitution ring. Murphy was the dominant personality in the cult and had the motives to commit the slayings. To this day, I am still not satisfied that Drew was present at any of the murders.

But he's in for life.

Murphy will soon be eligible for parole. She was denied parole about five years ago [1994].

[Paul Carey, “Undercover in a murderous cult,” APB News, March 23, 1999]

***

Wikipedia article: “The Fall River Murders” –

The Fall River murders were a series of three homicides that took place in Fall River, Massachusetts, from October 1979 to February 1980 allegedly by a satanic cult. It was the onset of a period in American history known as the Satanic panic.

The first murder, 17-year-old Doreen Levesque, was committed on the night of October 13, 1979. Her body was found under the bleachers of Diman Vocational High School in Fall River the following morning. No person was ever convicted of the Levesque murder.

The second murder, 19-year-old Barbara Raposa, was committed on November 7, 1979, but her body was not discovered until January 26, 1980. Andy Maltais was convicted and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the Raposa murder.

The third murder, 20-year-old Karen Marsden, is thought to have been committed on February 8, 1980. Portions of her skull were discovered on April 13, 1980. Her body has never been recovered. Multiple individuals were charged in the Marsden murder, but only Carl Drew and Robin Murphy were convicted. Carl Drew was convicted at trial and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Robin Murphy pleaded guilty to second degree murder as part of an agreement to testify on behalf of the prosecution and received a reduced sentence.

The Fall River murders are the subject of the 2021 documentary series Fall River produced by Blumhouse and directed by James Buddy Day.

~ Doreen Levesque murder ~

Doreen Ann Levesque was a 17-year-old resident of New Bedford who had left foster care and had no fixed address. On the night of her murder, she had traveled to Fall River to engage in prostitution with another sex worker, "Gail." Witnesses reported seeing Doreen being intoxicated downtown at several establishments and engaging in prostitution on Pleasant Street.

At approximately 6:00 a.m. on October 13, 1979, Doreen's body was found under the bleachers of Diman Vocational High School by two joggers, who were using the school's running track. She had been sexually assaulted and bludgeoned to death and was identified only after police released a composite drawing to local newspapers.

~ Barbara Raposa murder ~

Barbara Raposa was a 19-year-old single mother with a history of drug abuse and sex work. She was reported missing on November 7, 1979 by her father after she had failed to pick up her son from a babysitter. She was last seen around 8:15 p.m. by a male friend who had dropped her off in downtown so that she could work as a prostitute.

Barbara's body was found by hunters several months later, on January 26, 1980, in a wooded area on the outskirts of Fall River. Autopsy results indicated that she was killed shortly after she had last been seen.

~ Karen Marsden murder ~

Karen Marsden was a 20-year-old mother and sex worker in the Fall River area who had frequent contacts with police. On the night of her disappearance, police had questioned Karen as a potential witness to the murder of Doreen Levesque. On February 9, 1980, Karen refused to identify Doreen's killer, refused an offer of witness protection, and asked police to drop her off at a church in Fall River. Karen was reported missing the following day by her grandmother. Karen's partial remains were found in Westport, Massachusetts on April 13, 1980.

***

CHRONOLOGY

Oct. 13, 1979 – Doreen Levesque (17) murdered.

Nov. 7, 1979 – Barbara Ann Raposa. (19) murdered.

Jan. 26, 1980 – Barbara Raposa’s body was found by hunters.

Feb. 8, 1980 – Karen Marsden (20), murdered; roommate of Robin Murphy.

Apr. 13, 1980 – Portions of Karen Marsden’s skull discovered.

May 11, 1980 – Indictment of Robin Murphy (17; 137 IQ), Carl Drew, & Andrew Maltais.

1980 – Robin Murphy pleads guilty to second degree murder of Karen Marsden as part of an agreement to testify on behalf of the prosecution, receives a reduced sentence.

Jan. 19, 1981 – Andrew C. Maltais trial.

Jan. 1981 – Andrew C. Maltais convicted of murdering Barbara Ann Raposa.

Mar. 13, 1981 – Carl Drew (26) convicted of the murder of Karen Marsden; sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole; Fitchburg, Ma.

2004 – Murphy, who has a shot at freedom because she cut a plea deal, was actually free from 2004 – Robin Murphy, granted parole.

July 19, 2011 – Robin Murphy, loses parole after arrest during a traffic stop. Her passenger had heroin in her purse.

Mar. 13, 2017 – Robin Murphy Parole denied. “I have never seen a case more shot through with lies and deceit by a person seeking parole than this one,” Board Member Roger Michel Jr. said during the hearing. “I don’t think you would know the truth if it jumped out of the ground and slapped you in the face.”

***

***

***

***

***

***

***


***

***

 

***

***

***

 ***

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/12/female-serial-killers-who-liked-to.html

Links to more cases: Female Serial Killers Who Like to Murder Women

***

For more cases of this type, see: Occult Female Serial Killers

[2059-7/23/21; 3962-10/4/21; 6128-7/27/22]
***