Surprised at what you see above? Don’t be embarrassed. We have all been victims of the con game called institutional misandry. “Herstory” is not the truth. The “Rule of Thumb” story of domestic violence abuse has been exposed as an example of scholarly fraud. It is just one more example, among many of a feminist hoax.
***
FULL
TEXT: According to the “Act to prevent cruelty to Women” recently incorporated
into the statutes of Nevada, a "Wife Beater's Whipping Post" has
recently been put in position in front of
the court-house of Austin in that State. This post is not erected for the
convenience of husbands who believe that to spare the rod is to spoil the
woman, as it is not the
wives who are tied to it during the process of flagellation. hut their lords
and masters, who upon conviction of the crime of wife beating are delivered
into the gentle hands of the constable for their just deserts. Tied to this
post in the broad publicity of the city square at mid day, the wife whipper is
made to understand by numerous lashes well laid on, that the accomplishment of
wife whipping is one deserving of public recognition Nevada must be nice State,
if the crime in question is so common that the post for its punishment is as
prominent an institution as the calaboose in ordinary towns. The Reveille says
that every woman who passes the Austin post, casts upon it looks of undisguised
admiration.
[Untitled,
Butte Miner (Mt.), Nov. 20, 1877, p. 2]
***
►• You have been told that before the rise of feminism in the 1960s that domestic violence against women was tolerated by society as acceptable behavior and was not taken seriously by police and the courts.
►19th Century Intolerance Towards Domestic Violence
► Treatment of Domestic Violence Against Women Before 1960 – this post collects cases classified by the form of punishment or sentencing (whether judicial or through community action)
No, the claim that laws created by males were for the benefit of males is false. Yes, the "Rule of Thumb" myth has been proven to be a marxist-feminist hoax, taking an ancient English common historical notation published in the 18th century and extrapolating it into unsupported claims that 18th and 20th century United States communities, courts and legislatures (laws on the books) were in agreement with the18th century historical notation (Blackstone).
***
►• You have been told that before the rise of feminism in the 1960s that domestic violence against women was tolerated by society as acceptable behavior and was not taken seriously by police and the courts.
You have been lied to. The people who told you these
lies were paid to tell them you. In most cases you paid your own money (taxes
and tuition fees) to be lied to.
Here is one of countless pieces of evidence that demonstrate
the truth.
►•►• To see more eloquent, vivid
evidence proving the lie and giving you the truth, see:
►19th Century Intolerance Towards Domestic Violence
► Treatment of Domestic Violence Against Women Before 1960 – this post collects cases classified by the form of punishment or sentencing (whether judicial or through community action)
No, the claim that laws created by males were for the benefit of males is false. Yes, the "Rule of Thumb" myth has been proven to be a marxist-feminist hoax, taking an ancient English common historical notation published in the 18th century and extrapolating it into unsupported claims that 18th and 20th century United States communities, courts and legislatures (laws on the books) were in agreement with the18th century historical notation (Blackstone).
***
“[O]nly since the 1970s has the criminal justice system
begun to treat domestic violence as a serious crime, not as a private family
matter.”
From the entry: “Domestic Violence” on encyclopedia.com
This claim has been proven to be false.
***
No comments:
Post a Comment