FULL TEXT: A coincidence has occurred, which, as Pepys would have said, “it is pretty to observe,” while Madame Laffarge in France, and Mrs. Cutts in England, have been charged with poisoning their husbands, we learn by the American papers that a similar accusation is preferred against a Mrs. Kinney, at Boston. Mrs. Kinney, whose maiden name was Hannah Hanson, was first married to a Mr. Witham; from whom, after having given birth to four children, she was divorced, and married to Mr. Freeman, a clergyman. Mr. Kinney, it is said, assisted in procuring the divorce; and after the second marriage, he was in the habit of visiting Mrs. Freeman’s house. During one of his visits, Mr. Freeman was taken ill, and died; and his symptoms have since been supposed to indicate that he had been poisoned. Mrs. Freeman was thus free to marry a third time. It is observed as a suspicious circumstance, that soon after she married Mr. Freeman, her husband’s father died suddenly, while the newly-married couple were on a visit at his house. Freeman's body was exhumed in August; and it was found to be in a remarkable state of preservation. Mrs. Kinney is in custody; and an investigation, to which she is said to have opposed no obstacle, is shortly to take place.
[Untitled (under “United States” header), The Colonial Gazette (London, England), Oct. 7, 1840, p. 671]
***
Excerpt from a book on the history of Lowell, Massachusetts, published in 1868.
***
Excerpt from a book on the history of Lowell, Massachusetts, published in 1868.
“The Minister’s Wooing” had deeply exercised the ladies of
the First Baptist Church, long before that subject employed the pen of Mrs.
Harriet Beecher Stowe. Church Committees, Ex Parte Councils and Mutual
Councils were again and again appointed to consider the scandals growing out of
the courtship of Rev. Enoch W. Freeman and Hannah Hanson. Mr. Freeman was, of
course, sustained; but there was still an undercurrent of discontent in the
church, on account of his connection with this remarkable woman. She was a
native of Lisbon, in Maine, was the cousin of Mr. Freeman, and had had some
tender correspondence with him in early life. In January, 1822, she was married
to Ward Witham, at her father’s house in Portland. Four children were the fruit
of this marriage, which proved anything but a happy one. In February, 1832, the
Supreme Judicial Court, sitting at Boston, granted her a decree of divorce from
the bond of matrimony, on account of the criminality of Witham. A
correspondence between Mr. Freeman and her soon afterward commenced, which
culminated in their marriage, September 23rd, 1834. For six months they boarded
with Mrs. Charlotte Butler, whose son Benjamin—the future proconsul of New
Orleans — was at that time intended for the Baptist ministry.
As Pope sighed “How sweet an Ovid was in Murray lost,” so
may others lament that a Boanerges of the pulpit was spoiled in Butler. In
March, 1835, Mr. and Mrs. Freeman made a visit to the father of Mr. Freeman, in
Maine. During that visit, the elder Freeman suddenly died, exhibiting the same
symptoms which were afterward observed in the case of his son.
Mrs. Freeman continued to be the subject of scandal after
her marriage, en account of her supposed intimacy with George T. Kinney of
Boston, who had assisted her in obtaining her divorce, and to whom she was said
to have been engaged. It was said that Kinney was a frequent visitor at Mr.
Freeman’s, house, and that he was there on the morning of Sunday, September
20th, 1835. On that day, after morning service, Mr. Freeman became suddenly
ill, and experienced repeated vomitings. He, however, returned to his pulpit,
and commenced the afternoon services, but was unable to proceed, and returned
to his house. He continued to grow worse, suffering intense pain internally,
until five o’clock on the morning of the following Tuesday, when death released
him from his sufferings. He was thirty-seven years of age, and had been married
exactly one year. He was a most uxorious husband, and on his death-bed
requested that all his wife’s children by Witham should adopt his surname. If
he really died by poison administered by his wife, his last words to her—”
Never feel alone; I shall always be with you”—must have come home with terrible
emphasis to her depraved soul.
Just as he closed his eyes in death, he was asked whether he
had any advice to leave to his church. He replied, “Tell them to be humble,
faithful, zealous and united in love.” A post mortem examination showed
his stomach to have been highly inflamed, but the contents were not subjected
to a chemical analysis—no suspicion being then
entertained that the death was caused by poison. Mrs. Freeman appeared to be
deeply affected by her bereavement. One week subsequently, she was confined.
She remained for some time in Lowell, keeping a milliner’s shop on Merrimack
street. She afterward removed to Boston, from whence she sent a weeping willow
to be planted by the monument erected over Mr. Freeman’s grave. On November
26th, 1836, she was married to George T. Kinney, a man five years younger than
herself—a drunkard, a roue and a gambler. On August 10th, 1840, Kinney
died in a manner similar to Mr. Freeman; and a coroner’s jury found that his
death was caused by poison administered by his wife.
Long before the death of Kinney, suspicions had been
entertained in Lowell that there had been foul play with Mr. Freeman—that his
wife had been guilty of the “deep damnation of his taking off.” In consequence
of these suspicions, one week subsequent to the death of Kinney, Mr. Freeman’s
remains were exhumed in the Middlesex street burying-ground and found to be in
a remarkable state of preservation. Many a subject has been used to illustrate
anatomical lectures, which was more decomposed than the body of Mr. Freeman.
Immediately after Kinney’s funeral, Mrs. Kinney made a visit
to some of his friends in Thetford, Vermont. There she was arrested and taken
back to Boston to stand her trial for murder. On her way thither she stopped at
Lowell, arriving here on Sunday afternoon, August 30th. After a few moments’
delay, at the American House, she again left in the stage for Boston, in the
custody of an officer. Just as the stage was leaving, the congregation to whom
Mr. Freeman had ministered, and among whom she had once moved in all the dignity
of a pastor’s wife, poured along the streets at the close of their afternoon
services. With what emotion they gazed on the weeping prisoner, and with what
agony she met their gaze, it is easier to imagine than describe.
The trial of Mrs. Kinney for the murder of Kinney began
December 21st, 1840, and closed on Christmas Day. The defence was conducted by
Franklin Dexter and George T. Curtis. Although she was acquitted by the jury,
there have always been persons among those who knew her, who have persisted in
believing that she was guilty, — that she poisoned two
husbands and one husband’s father,—in short, that she was an American
Lucretia Borgia. But while the deaths of the three supposed victims are most
easily explained upon the hypothesis of poison, the total absence of motive on
the part of the accused, envelopes each case in the gravest doubt. [Note: The
compulsive killer’s motive – deriving pleasure for killing – is different, much
less logical from the point of view of the ordinary person, than the purely
instrumental killer, but this was unknown at the time.]
[Charles Cowley, Illustrated history of Lowell, 1868, Lee & Shepard, Boston, p. 111 ff.]
***
Deaths:
Elder Freema, father-in-law, died, March, 1835
Rev. Enoch W. Freeman, 2nd husband, died Sep. 29,
1835
George T. Kinney, 37, 3rd husband, died Aug. 10,
1840
For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.
***
For more cases of this category, see: Female Serial Killers of 19th Century America
***
[2215-1/23/19]
***
[2215-1/23/19]
***
No comments:
Post a Comment