Serial Baby-Killing Moms

This list is restricted to those female serial killers who focused their homicidal attention on the murdering of their own babies. Many serial killer mothers murdered older children (as well as step-children and child relatives), but these cases are not included here.

***

1848    Mary May – Colchester, England – 14 children
1849    Rebecca Smith – Devizes, England – 8 newborns

1871    Ann Burns – Wigan, Lancashire, England –3: step-f & 2 own babies

1877    Elizabeth Kirkbride – Liverpool, England – 8 own babies

1886    Mary Hart – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – 13 own babies suspected

1888    Eva Micsik – Csoka, Hungary; 8 own babies

1889    Sophie Von Mesko – “Lipes,” Hungary – 5 children & 1 husband?

1894    Martha Needle – Richmond, Australia, 3 own babies, husband, fiancee’s brother

1906    Bridget Carey – Centralia, Pa.; husband, 2 own babies, 2 boarders

1908    Grete Beyer – Brand, Saxony (Germany), 4: husband & 3 babies
1908    Francesca Herrera (& husband Molina) – Seville, Spain – 18 babies
1914    “Edinburgh Serial Baby-Killing Mom” – Edinburgh, Scotland – 3 babies
1942    Dorothy Hahn – Adelaide, Australia – 3 babies

1943    Bernice Williams – Denver, Co. – 3 newborns
1950    Juanita Louise Carr – Fossil, Oregon, USA – 3 victims
1950    Mrs. Schaub – Baltimore, Md. – 3 babies

1954    Elsie Rodgers – Burton-On-Trent, England – 3 babies

1969    Yvette Lelièvre – Saint-Pierre-lès-Nemours, France – with husb. André – 7 newborns
1969    Barbara Wilkinson – Wahroonga, Australia – 6 newborns

1969    Martha Woods – Baltimore, Md. – 3 own babies, neph, nce, neighbor’s ch, adopted son

1980    Stella Williamson – Gallitzin, Pa. – 5 infants

1984    Debra Sue Tuggle – Little Rock, Ark. – 4 victims

1984    Lisa Jane Turner – Christchurch, N. Zealand – 2 babies, 1 other baby, 4 other attempts

1986    Marybeth Tinning – Schenectady, NY – 8 victims suspected

1987    Debbie Fornuto (Deborah Gedzius) – Chicago, Il. – 6 own babies, 3 different fathers

1988    Myriam Marlein – Ostend, Belgium – 8 newborns (including twins)

1993    Kazuko Hatayama – Honjo, Japan – 8 newborns
1989    Tammy Corbett – Carlinville, Illinois – 3 own babies

1989    Martha Ann Johnson – Clayton County, Ga. – 3 victims

1990    Diane Lumbrera – Garden City, Ks. – 6 own babies

1991    Shavonda Charleston – Louisville, Ky. – 4 own babies

1993    Denise Dianna Buchanan – Washoe County, Nevada – 3 own babies

1993    Gail Lynn Savage – Waukegan, Il. – 3 children

1995    Filita Mashilipa – Zambia – cannibal, witchcraft; 7 own babies

1995    Maxine Robinson – Chester-le-Street, England – 3 own babies

1995    Claudette Kibble - Houston, Tx –  3 own babies

1996    Waneta Hoyt – Newark Valley, NY – 5 victims

1999    Marie Noe – Philadelphia, Pa. – 8 victims

2002    Gloria Jean Greenfield – Warren, Ohio – 3 own babies

2002    “Toda Serial Killer Mother” – Toda, Japan – 6 newborns         

2003    Kathleen Folbigg – Mayfield, Australia – 6 victims: 4 own babies

2003    Diane O’Dell – Rome, Pa. & NY – 4 own babies

2006    Chizuko Okamoto – Hiratsuka, Japan – 4 children, 3 infants & daughter (19)

2005    Sabine Hilschenz – Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany – 9 babies, flower pots

2006    Gertraud Arzberger – Graz, Austria – 4 own babies
2006    Jolanta K. – Lublin, Poland – 5 newborns
2007    “Susann F.” – Plauen, Germany – 3 own children

2007    Céline Lesage – Valognes, France – 6 newborns

2007    Shirley Winters – Syracuse, NY – 2 babies + 5 other babies susp

2008    Monika Halbe – Wenden, Germany – 3 babies, freezer

2009    Veronique Courjault – Tours, France – 3 own babies

2009    “Ota Ward Tokyo Serial Killer Mother” – Ota Ward, Tokyo, Japan –  4 babies

2010    Meredith Katharine Borowiec – Calgary, Canada; 3 newborns, 1 survived

2010    Dominique Cottrez – Villers-au-Tertre, France – 8 own babies

2010    “Geleen Serial Killer Mother” – Geleen, Netherlands – 3 newborns

2010    Michele Kalina – Reading, Pa. – 5 newborns

2010    Sietske Hoekstra – Nij Beets, Friesland, Netherlands – 4 newborns
2010    Bernadette Quirk – St Helens, Merseyside, Eng. – 4 babies, claimed “stillborn”

2012    “Husum Baby-Killing Mother” – Husum (greater Flensburg), Germany – 5 babies

2012    Beata Z. – Hipolitowo, Poland – 5 own babies
2013    Lucyna D. – Lubawa, Poland – 3 newborns
***

Disposal of the Murdered Babies’ Corpses

Arsenic – Rebecca Smith

Attic – Sietske Hoekstra

Buckets filled with Concrete – Gertraud Arzberger

Bury in garden – Yvette Lelièvre

Cardboard Boxes – Chizuko Okamoto (with plastic bags)

Cooler – Michele Kalina (storage closet)

“Containers” – Michele Kalina (storage closet; plastic bags, one encased in concrete)

Dumpster – Meredith Katharine Borowiec
Fireplace – Mrs. Schaub

Flower pots – Sabine Hilschenz

Freezer – Monika Halbe; Veronique Courjault; Gertraud Arzberger, Lucyna D.

Incinerate – Yvette Lelièvre

Paper packages – Elizabeth Kirkbride

Plastic Bags – Céline Lesage (stored in basement); Dominique Cottrez (black trash bags); “Toda Serial Killer Mother” (5 in plastic bag and one in a plastic case)

Plastic case – “Toda Serial Killer Mother”

Shed – “Geleen Serial Killer Mother”

Steamer trunk – Stella Williamson

Storage Boxes – “Husum Baby-Killing Mother”

Storage shed – Diane O’Dell

Stable, cellar & attic – Beata Z.

Suitcases – “Geleen Serial Killer Mother” (in attic); Susann F. (in attic)
Wardrobe (with air freshener) – Bernadette Quirk

***

Classification: (“SIDS” (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), “Crib Death”)

1969    Martha Woods (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

1984    Debra Sue Tuggle

1984    Lisa Jane Turner

1986    Marybeth Tinning

1987    Debbie Fornuto

1989    Martha Ann Johnson

1991    Shavonda Charleston

1993    Denise Dianna Buchanan

1993    Gail Lynn Savage

1996    Waneta Hoyt (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

1999    Marie Noe

2002    Gloria Jean Greenfield

2003    Kathleen Folbigg (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

2007    Shirley Winters

***

Classification: Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy

1969    Martha Woods (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

1990    Diane Lumbrera – Garden City, Ks. – 6 own babies

1996    Waneta Hoyt (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

2003    Kathleen Folbigg (Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy)

***

Accused but Cleared of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy

1998    Sally Clark – Manchester, England – conviction overturned; 2 children died

2002 – Trupti Patel – Berkshire, England – acquitted in 2003; 3 children died

2002 – Angela Cannings – England – conviction overturned 2003; 3 children died

Kept Diary Describing the Murders

1889    Sophie Von Mesko – “Lipes,” Hungary – 5 children & 1 husband?

2003    Kathleen Folbigg – Mayfield, Australia – 6 victims: 4 own babies

***

Early Men’s Rights Writings by C. M. Castellazzo – 1927

FULL TEXT: Alameda county’s “alimony martyr,” Emil R. Whittenberg, is willing to go to work and pay alimony in order to get out of jail, but he was still a cell inmate today, his fourteenth day of imprisonment. No longer is he a militant striker openly, whatever his private convictions on alimony, he now craves the freedom of the wide open spaces.

But Wittenberg’s freedom largely depends upon the consent of his wife to arrangements by which he may get out of jail and work for her support. Her attitude today remained constant, if he will pay, he may go free, but no pay, no freedom.

Conference between Public Defender Willard Shea and Attorney Clarence De Lancey, counsel for Mrs. Wittenberg, is being held today over Wittenberg’s plea.

Even the moral support of Sam W. Reid, famous alimony-martyr of Glenn county, California, failed to hold Wittenberg against the craving for freedom.

~ ANOTHER SYMPATHIZER. ~

Wittenberg’s plight has attracted another sympathizer, C. M. Castellazzo, box 1533 Redwood road, Castellazzo wants to enlist the men in a general campaign against the "women’s clubs.” “It will take manhood to put it over,” he wrote Wittenberg.

Castellazzo’s letter says in part:

I read with interest that, you are forming an Anti-Alimony club. I understand that the club will urge special legislation for alimony payers. Let me inform you that it will take move than mere urging to put it over.

You have the combined forces of women’s clubs against you. You note that the women’s clubs which claim to have high ideals and an eagerness for righteousness are not helping you in your predicament. It will take manhood to put it over. It requires initiative by taking what is right, not mere urging.

I , too, am forming a club. It will stand for more than Anti-Alimony. The club will stand for Anti-Alimony, Anti-Prohibition, Anti-Hypocrisy, and a few other important items which I do not care to discuss by letter.

All men worthy of the name men, who are not mentally degenerate, such as those who figure that the women are always right – are eligible to the club. Since you state that you are without funds, I am enclosing a 2-cent stamp, should you wish to make a reply. Wishing you the best of luck, I am,

Very truly yours, C. M. CASTELLAZZO...

~ POOR MEN, SAYS THIS WRITER ~

Signing himself “Another Alimony Dodger,” still another supporter came to Wittenberg’s camp today. He said:

“Dear Sir:

“It is with interest I read of your case, and I heartily sympathize with your case. America is today run by women. When a man is so foolish as to marry one of them, he is done for, so long as she cares to hang on to him.

“About the only relief that the man has is that some other bonehead will come along and take friend wife off his hands. Every man of experience knows that most wives will not give up one meal ticket until she has the next in sight.

“I am wondering if there isn’t a better way out of your difficulties than the one you have chosen. Isn’t it possible for you to pay tip and leave California? It seems a shame that you should have to waste your time and lose your freedom over such a trifling matter.

“You are at least lucky in being divorced. Some of us have not been so fortunate. I personally spent about four hours in jail, and three weeks later, when I got things in shape, I took a 2000-mile trip for my health. I found my health so much better that I have never gone hack.

“You will only afford your alimony-grabber satisfaction by remaining in jail when you might be working to your own advantage if you were free and out of California.

“More power to you! I hope you never pay, but that, you will work out some scheme to beat the alimony graft.

“American men are today the laughing stock of the rest of the world, and of their more intelligent fellow Americans – and they deserve to be.

“Never in the history of the human race have men fallen into such a preposterous situation as that of most American husbands. The humor of the situation lies in the fact unil they have built the net in which they are now floundering. One by one they have passed stupid and asinine laws till today a man has as much right to say what shall be done with his properly, his children, or even his person, as a jack ass.

“Well, I must close. Here’s a handshake for you and all the fellow alimony dodgers. Perhaps in time other slaves will gee the light and stand out against this asinine and tyrannous graft. Until that time it will be each of us for himself and the devil take the hindmost.”

[“Alimony Martyr Ready to Work and Pay, Escape Jail,” Oakland Tribune (Ca.), Nov. 18, 1927, p. 18]

Female Serial Killers of 19th Century America

There are at least 49 known Female Serial Killers of 19^th century America.

1829 – Cannon, Martha “Patty” – Maryland/Delaware state line           

1840 – Kinney, Hannah Hanson – Boston & Lowell, Massachusetts

1845 – Reed, Mrs. Elizabeth – Lawrenceville, Illinois
1852 – Hufford, Nancy  – Cumberland, Md., Somerset, Pa.

1857 – Frisch (Hoag), Polly – Alabama, Genessee County, New York

1858 – Westlake, Phebe (nee Irwin) – Chester, New York

1860 – Jackson, Mary Jane “Bricktop” – New Orleans, Louisiana

1860 – McCraney, Elizabeth P. – Lancaster, Wisconsin; Medford, Otsego, N. Y.

1865 – Grinder, Martha – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

1869 – “Gardiner, Maine Black Widow Serial Killer” – Gardiner, Maine
1869 – White, Mrs. – Lafayette Township, Sussex County, New Jersey
1871 – Sherman, Lydia – New Brunswick, New Jersey; New Haven & Danby, Ct.

1871 – Wharton, Elizabeth – Baltimore, Maryland

1872 – Batchelor, Catherine – Lockport, Indiana

1872 – Lamb, Charlotte – Trimbelle, Wisconsin

1873 – Bender, Kate & Katie (“Bloody Benders”) – Cherry Vale, Kansas

1873 – Earhardt, Sarah  – Germantown, Ohio
1873 – York, Mrs. – Moweaqua, Illinois

1875 – Reignolds, Mary – Holliston, Massachusetts (child care provider)

1876 – McClosky, Margaret – New York, New York (child care provider)
1877 – Worcester, Rozilla – New York, New York (child care provider)
1878 – Drake, Mrs. David –Westfield, Massachusetts

1878 – Hardman (Gibbs), Sallie – Enon, Ohio
1879 – Danbrough, Alice – Lebanon, Illinois

1882 – Wright, Phyllis – Savanna, Georgia
1883 – Stillwell, Emma – Waterford, Ohio
1884 – Haight, Angenette B. S. – Morrisville, New York
1884 – Nivison, Miss S. S. – Hammonton, New Jersey (child care provider)

1885 – Kleman, Mary – Dubuque, Iowa

1886 – Dockery, Sarah J. – Fulton, Kentucky

1886 – Hart, Mary – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

1886 – Robinson, Sarah Jane – Somerville, Massachusetts

1887 – McDonald, Cynthia – Rochester, New York (child care provider)

1887 – Snoots, Annie – Adamsville, Ohio

1888 – Whiteling, Sarah  – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
1889 – Brennan, Lizzie  – Holyoke, Massachusetts

1889 – Glynn, Mary – Pittston, Pennsylvania
1889 – Seiffert, Jennie – St. Louis, Missouri (child care provider)

1890 – Claus, Charles & Catherine – Long Island, New York (child care provider)

1891 – Abbott, Evelyn – Roxbury, Massachusetts (child care provider)

1891 – Austin, Mrs. Thomas – Louisville, Kentucky

1891 – Dorsey, Mrs. John – Indianapolis, Indiana

1891 – Sorgenfrie, Mrs. Caroline D. – Rome, N.Y.

1892 – Hanson, Annie – Chicago, Illinois (child care provider)

1893 – Halliday, Lizzie – Burlingham, New York         

1893 – Meyer, Mrs. D. H. – Illinois, Indiana, New York & Ohio
1894 – Cowan, Mary – Dixmont, Maine
1896 – Powers, Mrs. C. M.– Springfield, Ohio

1897 – Layton, Jennie & Mary Sammon – Camden, New Jersey
1899 – Johnson, Lulu – Enid, Oklahoma Territory

***

4 DISCREDITED LEGENDS (19^th c): Rebecca Cotton, South Carolina, 1790s (actual person, murders are a legend); Lavinia Fisher, 1793-1820, Charleston, SC (actual criminal who was executed, but serial killings committed by her seem to be a legend); Delphine Marie LaLaurie (actual person, but serial murders are undocumented), Louisiana; Sally Skull, 1860s, Texas (unverified legend that she was a serial killer)

***
Peter Vronsky's list, published in 2007, containing 140 female serial killer cases, lists only five 19th century US cases: Bender, Cannon, Jackson, Robinson and Sherman. I have not included Rachel Wall, the piratess executed in Massachusetts in 1789, on my list, as it is uncertain what her role might have been in the 24 murders attributed to the crew with which she was associated.

***

The following article from 1873 demonstrates that the current widely-held belief that serial killers of the female sex are an anomaly was not held back then. Nor was that belief held in the 1920s either (“Three Women Who Admit Poisoning 29 Persons,” May 1, 1925). The myth of female killers’ being rare, in comparison with males, and related myths (that serial killers are primarily Caucasians or that they are rare outside North America) are of fairly recent origin (1980s).

FULL TEXT: Another female poisoner has been brought to justice. Recently, at Germantown, Ohio, public attention was attracted to the simultaneous poisoning by arsenic of three members of a family named Hanna, while visiting the house of a kinswoman, one Sarah Earhardt. Fortunately the amount administered to each of the intended victims proved insufficient to cause death. Upon investigation evidence was produced, if correct, proving the woman Earlhardt to be as great a monster as either Lydia Sherman, Jane Ann Cotton or Mrs. Grinder. She is now in custody on a charge of having attempted to take the lives of the three Hannas, and it is to be the intention of the State prosecuting counsel to introduce testimony at the trial to show that she has poisoned her husband, her son’s wife, her son-in-law’s child, and her husband’s first wife, all within a few years. Minor crimes, such its the poisoning of juvenile animals and the burning of numerous houses, are also said to be among the number of her achievements. By the death of the Hannas she would have come into possession of a considerable amount of property. The most extraordinary circumstance in connection with this case is that the woman is upward of seventy years of age.

[“Another Female Poisoner.” The Bloomfield Times (New Bloomfield, Pa.),  Jun. 10, 1873, p. 4]

***

***

***

Sophisticated Feminist Intellectuals Just LOVE “Critical Theory”

Most feminists have mastered the intricacies of Einstein’s theory of relativity, having taken a minimum of 24 hours of 300 level or higher Gender Studies courses. Unlike a patriarch, a well-educated feminist can explain Einstein’s groundbreaking concept, the question of its veracity as well as its scientific significance, in only a few words, such as these:

“Everything is relative, right?”

“Einstein proved that, didn’t he?”

***

So get with the post-modern program. Don’t be patriarchal; study critical theory. It is progressive! Wayyyy progressive!

Gramsci rules! The “long march though the institutions”continues. Oppressors beware.

“Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.)” 

– Alan Sokal  (“A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies,” Lingua Franca. May/June 1996) 

***

The Sh*t Heard Round the World: Germaine Greer’s Philosophy of Hate – 1970

The significance of the hugely influential 1970 book, The Female Eunuch, by Germaine Greer, is eloquently explained in this important article on the origins of the misandrist tyranny that we see growing like a cancer around us:

“Big Sister: the legacy of Germaine Greer” by Neil Lyndon, A Voice for Men, January 15, 2013

***

Mangina & Feminist preparing to enter Utopia

Are you a properly conditioned, well-trained, politically correct and obedient “Good Man?”

Then you want to be sure to avoid learning anything from the copious and carefully selected historical documentation that appears on The Unknown History of MISANDRY.

This odious, politically incorrect website, reeking with false consciousness (a wonderful term invented by our Bolshevik comrades), and tries to confuse you and make you disobedient by publishing banned information that your loving gender studies professors have, in their selfless quest for pure equality, and for your own good, so carefully excised from Herstory.

***

The Unknown History of MISANDRY – GREATEST HITS

***

Nullify Misandry: The 10th Amendment is the Answer

Defunding misandry cannot come about by lobbying bribe-taking elected servants. They will not follow the Constitution.

The de-funding of misandry will come about the same way as the de-funding of the police state in general, the fiat money fraud system and the war-for-profit racket.

***

See this hilarious, well-done and succinct video introduction to the nullification concept:

“Interview with a Zombie,” by Dr. Thomas Woods.

***

We are all duty-bound to resist all unconstitutional laws. An unconstitutional “law” is not a law.

Visit the Tenth Amendment Center. Get active. When we nullify government rackets we nullify the institutions of misandry.

***

Here is a 72 minute documentary film, free on YouTube: “Nullification: The Rightful Remedy”

 *** 

NOTE: Apparently some misandrists have seen this post and, in their infinite ignorance, have interpreted it as a reference to the specific issue of jury nullification as pertaining to specific laws which reduce the level of evidence in rape allegation cases, thereby violating constitutionally verified and protected due process.

For those who need to recover from their indoctrination:

Jury nullification is the exercise of constitutional sovereignty. Interposition and states’ nullification are extensions of the same. Misandry can take many forms. Nullification applies to all cases of STATE misandry.

An unconstitutional "law" is no law at all.

Why let the big gov't collectivists and special interests control the debate?

Men's rights is not about women (fake big money "rape culture" advertising, etc.). It is about men and their natural rights in the face of all who oppose those natural rights.

The Federal government erased civics studies from the schools. WE wonder why.

***

Against Civil Rights for Men

This collection is devoted to statements directed against the Men’s Rights Movement specifically rather than being a general compendium of misandric quotations.

***

►• “it’s more than unnecessary to discuss whether feminism has “gone too far” — it’s dangerous and wrong.”

[Katie J. M. Baker, “Men’s Rights Activists Don’t Deserve the Benefit of the Doubt,” Jezebel, Sep.10, 2012]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• “One of the incredibly dangerous aspects of the MRA movement is the father’s rights movement …”

[“Why the MRA (Men’s Rights Activist) Movement is Dangerousfor Women,” WTF (What the Feminist), Feb. 28, 2012]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• “we need to take heed of the reemerging, online, campus oriented men’s rights movement and its propaganda. They are dangerous and the false ideas they propound will appeal to many young men on campuses and may lay the foundation for the next in a seemingly ceaseless wave of attacks on the feminist fight for women’s equality.”

[Michael Laxer, “Ontario. Lies our fathers told us: The men’s rights movement and campus-based misogyny,” rabble.ca, Oct. 4, 2012]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• “The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a US non-profit organisation dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, has named men’s rights activists (MRAs) as a hate group in its latest quarterly publication.” [FACT: The SPLC (a wealthy and frequently anti-Constitution oriented advocacy organization) did not name men’s rights activists as a “hate group” in this or any other publication that we know of.]

[Jane Osmond, WVoN co-editor, “Men’s rights activists named as hate group,” Women’s Views on News, Mar. 19, 2012]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• “The Men’s Rights Movement is an organized, dedicated and growing hate movement that constitutes an explicit and violently oriented backlash against women and feminism.”

[Michael Laxer, “The Men’s Rights Movement, CAFE and the University of Toronto.” Dec. 14, 2012]

►• “Well, yes, but don't ignore the reason for the pushback: men's traditional privileges really are under attack. It's just that these rights, like the right to beat and rape your wife with impunity, are anathema to a truly free and equitable society. -- So they agitate for the right to rape and assault? – Not in so many words. But the MRAs do certainly seem preoccupied by the loss of that privilege.”

[Jeff Fecke, “Explainer: What's an MRA?” Shakesville, Oct. 12, 2007]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• EXCERPT from a petition: “The Men's Rights Movement, while claiming to be for the betterment of both sexes, wishes for nothing more than to diminish the accomplishments of women, to vilify women, and to set women back by harassing them into silence, along with placing them in danger through their actions, which they openly admit are illegal.

Please sign this petition in order to have anything and everything that is Anti-Feminist and Anti-Woman, and also related to advocacy of the "Men's Rights Movement", defaulted as terrorism, or promotional of hatred and violence, so that the content may be flagged and removed from YouTube as it should be. Or, if nothing else, to send a message to the MRM, so that they know that this conduct is not appropriate.”

[Krista Heflin (Minneapolis, MN), “Google Inc., YouTube LLC: Categorize the MRM as flaggable forterrorism/promoting hate on YouTube.” change.org, Petitioning Google Inc., YouTube LLC, Jan. 7, 2013]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►• “And anti-feminist men’s groups seek to defend that; they’re a response to a critique of their privilege. And so they’re not the flipside of feminism or radical feminism. They’re in a fundamentally different position politically, in the same way that a race-hate group, like the Ku Klux Klan, is in a different position from the civil rights or Black power movements that seek to undermine racism and inequalities that people of colour experience.” (Michael Flood, sociologist, Australia)

[Rhys Price-Robertson, “Anti-feminist men’s groups in Australia: An Interview with Michael Flood,” DVRCV Quarterly (Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria) (Australia), Edition 3 – Spring/Summer 2012, p. 10]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

►•  “The last issue of the SPLC’s Intelligence Report presented a scathing portrait of “a hard-line fringe” of the Men’s Rights Movement (MRM): “women haters whose fury goes well beyond criticism of the family court system, domestic violence laws, and false rape accusations,” whose rage is “directed at all women, not only perceived feminists.”

[Arthur Goldwag, “Intelligence Report Article Provokes Fury Among Men’s Rights Activists,” SPLC Hatewatch, May 15, 2012]

[For a  critique of this quotation: John the Other, “The continuing education of Arthur Goldwag,” A Voice for Men,” May 17, 2012]

•◊•◊••◊•◊•

What Does A Kidnapper Look Like? - Like a False Rape Accuser!

False rape accusation is proxy kidnapping or, at best, an attempt to commit proxy kidnapping. False rape accusation is, like kidnapping an extremely serious crime and it is necessary that we begin to treat it that way.

***

From register-her.com – False Rape Accusers are individuals who willingly and knowingly makes or files a false rape accusation. This is arguably more corrosive to civil society than any other violent crime. False accusers make a cynical use of the legal system for personal vendetta, or in many cases, for profit and elevated social status which comes from being classified “victim.” Western courts and governments appear to be encouraging this, and incentivizing false rape accusations, by lowering the standards of evidence - and providing victim benefits, legal anonymity and reduced civil rights for individuals accused.

The list of false rape accusers presented on this site represents only the tip of the iceberg. A majority of false rape accusers are never charged, much less convicted. Among other things, many jurisdictions have informal policies not to charge false rape accusers due to external political pressures on the courts, which insist that charging false rape accusers will deter rape victims from coming forward. Some commentators have expressed a position that false accusers should not be charged at all. This is not the position of the editors of this site [register-her.com]. Of those false accusers who are charged, an inordinately high percentage are convicted. False rape reporting is the only crime for which charges are generally brought only when law enforcement is close to 100% certain of a conviction. But many false accusers are not charged, even after recantation.

***

Visit: register-her.com and Community of the Wrongly Accused for more information

***

Husbandicide: A Brief Overview of Its History from 1889

FULL TEXT: The crime of husbandicide – the word is as permissible as infanticide – is as old as the discovery, made a very long time ago, that marriage is sometimes a failure. Two thousand years ago Fabina Maximus ordered the execution of 170 women, who had leagued together for the purpose of murdering their husbands.

In the Middle Ages husband-poisoning threatened to become a popular if not a respectable institution. The inventor of the infamous Aqua Tofana [this is the name of the poison, actually: “Tofana Water”] pretended that, in enabling husbands and wives to «et quit of their troublesome partners she promoted the course of domestic harmony, and thus served a religious and conscientious purpose.

The idea, though hypocritical in its origin, got a fanatical hold of certain minds; and long after the recipe for the mysterious potion had been lost, there were poisoners who asserted the justifiable nature, if not the actual holiness of their grim profession. Less than a hundred years ago an old woman [Giovanna Bonanno] was executed at Palermo for dealing in a poisonous vinegar which she sold to any female who assured her that she had a bad husband of whom she wished to rid herself.

Husband-murder had, at one time, a special name in the vocabulary of English jurisprudence. Under the title of Petit-treason it was punished by strangulation and burning; and down to the thirtieth year of the reign of George III. this was the retribution meted out to women convicted of taking the lives of their consorts.

Poison, which effects its purpose without involving any conflict of physical force, is essentially a female weapon. This hypothesis is borne out by the French judicial statistics, which show that in twelve years there have been 260 women accused of murder by its means as against 219 men. Hence, while wives who die unnatural deaths are the victims of all kinds of violent crime, it is generally by poison that husbands met their end at the hands of their vindictive spouses.

 Of course, instances are not wanting of women who have availed themselves of the brutal procedure of the other sex, such as Catherine Hayes, who in 1728 gave her husband his quietus with a hatchett and Martha Alden who used a very unfeminine billhook for the same purpose eighty years later; but, as a general rule, the lethal instrument employed in such cases is poison. For instances we need not, unfortunately, travel out of our own country. Although we have not produced a Madame de Brinvilliers, or a Margaret Zwanziger, our criminal records afford many terrible examples of woman who have resorted to poison in order to remove a distasteful or betrayed husband. Many of these are similar in their details to the sensational case just tried at Liverpool.

In 1750 considerable public interest was aroused by the trial of Amy Huchinson, who was charged with administering a fatal dose of arsenic to her husband. The accused, who was only in her eighteenth year, had married John Hutchinson out of pique at the desertion of a former and more favored lover. The latter, however, returned on the very day of the wedding and met the bridal party coming out of church. The old intimacy was soon re-established, and speedily became criminal.

It was not long before Hutchinson's jealousy was aroused, and after many quarrels, the wife one day poured a strong dose of arsenic into her husband's ale, from the effects of which he died in a few hours. Amy was convicted, and notwithstanding her youth suffered death by strangulation and burning at Ely. Fifteen years later a similar case occurred in Forfarshire.

The accused, Katherine Ogilvie, formed a guilty attachment for her husband's brother, Lieutenant Patrick Ogilvie, in the first year of her married life. The liaison was discovered, and the younger Ogilvie was forbidden the house; whereupon the wife concerted measures with her lover to poison her husband. The poison, laudanum and arsenic, was supplied by Patrick, and administered by Mrs. Ogilvie in a bowl of tea. The laird died a few hours afterwards, declaring he had got his death from his wife’s hands.

The pair were tried and convicted. Patrick was executed; but Mrs. Ogilvie, after bearing  A child, managed to elude justice by escaping, Similar circumstances were repeated in a case which came before the assizes in 1772. The wife of a gentleman of position, Mr. John Bayer, of Riddleden, Bucks, was charged, together with her paramour, named Noble, with poisoning her husband. She was acquitted; but her accomplice was convicted and executed.

Another case occurred in 1843, when a man named Dudley, of Wrestlingford, was poisoned by his wife. No suspicion of the murder was entertained until eight months after, when the body was disinterred and the poisoned – arsenic – found in it in considerable quantities.

All the cases we have mentioned are cases of arsenic poisoning; but there are instances where other toxicological agents, each has strychnine and laudanum have been employed, in 1841 a woman named Coulroy was executed in Ireland for poisoning her husband with monkshood, a poison of very great activity, acting through the blood.

***

Celebrating “The Mutilate and Murder Males Culture” - 2012

A Voice for Men has published an article critical of a pop song released in December 2012 by Aaradhna, Lorena Bobbitt,” which celebrates and depicts the international known criminal’s misandric mayhem.

SEE: “Dawn Raid music – now that’s entertainment!” by Andy Man, A Voice for Men, Jan. 9, 2013

***

Here’s my take on the song and its reception as acceptable entertainment:

Yeah, but … it is OK to portray men as deserving of mutilation and murder. Perfectly AOK. Our educators have a “social justice” theory that tells us so. This is what is called “social change.”

In 1930s Germany it was acceptable to depict Jews this way because their educators had a “social justice” theory that told them so. In 1930s Russia it was acceptable to depict Kulaks this way because their educators had a “social justice” theory that told them so. In the 1910s USA it was acceptable to depict people with a slightly below average IQ this way because the educators had a “social justice” theory (eugenics) that told them so. In the 1920s USA it was acceptable to depict African-American men this way because the educators had a “social justice” theory that told them so. In 1960s Cambodia it was acceptable to depict people who spoke French, people who had a college degree and people who wore glasses this way because their educators had a “social justice” theory that told them so.

My professors have told me I should stand aside and watch the “social progress” unfold. They told me I am “privileged” because of dermatological reasons and genital reasons and because I am “heteronormative.”

I wonder if I should obey my betters, the “experts,” the social managers, the tenured philosophers of “social justice.” I wonder whether you will obey them and stand aside and keep quiet while “progress” occurs.

I wonder.

***

Serial Killer Couples

►Male-Female Couples (Alphabetical List)

Aldrete, Sara (Villareal) & Adolfo De Jesus Constanzo – Mexico City, Mex. – 1989

Beck, Martha Julie & Raymond Martinez Fernandez – Grand Rapids, Mi. – 1951

Birnie, Catherine &  David Birnie – Willagee, Western A,  Australia – 1986

“Bloody Innkeeper & Wife” – Pultoe, England – 1675

Bundy, Carol Mary & Douglas Daniel Clark – Los Angeles, Ca. – 1980

Carson, Susan & James Michael Carson – San Francisco, Ca. – 1984

Claus, Catherine & Charles Claus – Long Island, N. Y. – 1890 (baby farmers)

Coffman, Cynthia Lynn &  James Gregory Marlow – San Bernardino, Ca. – 1986

Cooper, Martha & Daniel Cooper – Newlands, New Zealand – 1923 (baby farmers)

Copeland, Faye & Ray Copeland – Mooresville, Mo. – 1989

Creighton, Mary Frances &  Everett Appelgate – Newark, N.J. – 1939

Dumollard, Marianne & Martin Dumollard – France –1862
Fugate, Caril Ann & Charles Raymond Starkweather – Lincoln, Ne. – 1958

Gallego, Charlene (Williams) & Gerald Armand Gallego – Sacramento, Ca. – 1980
Glynn, Mary & Edward Glynn – Pittston, Pa. – 1882

Graham, Gwendolyn Gail & Catherine May Wood – Grand Rapids, Mi. – 1989

Grigsby, Holly & David "Joey" Pedersen – Wureka, Ca. – 2012

Hendy, Cindy & David Ray – Elephant Butte, N M – 1999
Herrera, Francesca & Molina – Seville, Spain – 18 babies – 1908

Hindley, Myra &  Ian Duncan Brady – Hattersley, England – 1965

Holmen, Mrs. & Gustav Holmen – Stockholm, Sweden 1906 (baby farmers)

Homolka, Karla & Paul Bernardo – Saint Catharines, Ont., Canada – 1993

Ishikawa, Miyuki & Takeshi Ishikawa – Tokyo, Japan – (baby farmers)1948

Jackson, Pearl & Odell Jackson – Birmingham, Alabama – 1925

Kaneko & Husband – Tokyo Japan – 1921

King, Carolyn A., Martin Bradlyn A. – Lebanon County, Pa. – 1993
Knotek, Michelle & David Knotek – South Bend, Washington – 2004
L., Lydia & Siggie S. – Germany – 2012

Lelièvre, Yvetta &  André Lelièvre– Saint-Pierre-lès-Nemours, France – 1969

Lynch, Susan & Frederick Robert Klenner Jr. – Greensboro, North Carolina – 1985

Makin, Sarah & John Makin – Sydney, Australia – 1892 (baby farmers)

Meyer, Mary &  D. H. Meyer (Reuter, Mayler) – South Bend, In. – 1893

Neelley, Judith Ann & Alvin Neeley – Fort Payne, Al. – 1983

Ogata, Junko & Futoshi Matsunaga – Fukuoka, Kyodo, Japan – 2002

Oliveira da Silveira, Bruna & Jorge Negromonte da Silveira – Garanhuns, Brazil – 2012

Padgett, Ruby Carolyn &  Mitchell Carlton Sims – South Carolina, Calif. – 1985

Phillips, Charmaine & Pieter Grundlingh – South Africa –1983
Pimlett, Joseph & Mary – Runcorn, England –1846

Pires, Isabel Cristina & Jorge Negromonte da Silveira – Garanhuns, Brazil – 2012

Reignolds, Mary & Nelson Reignolds – Holliston, Maassachusetts (baby farmers) –1875

Ruiz Villeda, Anna Maria & Rudolfo Infante Jimenez – Matamoros, Mex. – 1991

Sifrit, Erica & Benjamin Sifrit – Pa., Md. – 2002

Tanaka (wife of Jukichi) – Tokyo, Japan – 1924

Watson, Mona Lisa & Michael Wayne Howell – Ala, Tenn., Okla, – 1989

Wells, Angela & Roland Wells – Peoria, Il. – 2011

West, Rosemary Pauline, West Frederick Walter – Gloucester, England – 1985

Wright, Blanche & Robert Young – New York, NY – 1980

Young, Lila Gladys & William Y. – Halifax, Nova Scotia, Can, – 1945 (baby farmers)

Zaepfel, Leigh Ann & Carrion Christopher Alan – Oklahoma –1990

Zhiqun, Duan & Ma Yong – Shenzhen, China – 2003

“Zhtomyr Serial Killer Couple” - Zhtomyr, Ukraine – 2002

***

►Male-Female Couples (Chronological List)

1675 – “Bloody Innkeeper & Wife” – Pultoe, England
1846 – Pimlett, Joseph & Mary – Runcorn, England
1862 – Dumollard, Marianne & Martin Dumollard – France
1875 – Reignolds, Mary & Nelson Reignolds – Holliston, Maassachusetts (baby farmers)
1882 – Glynn, Mary & Edward – Pittston, Pa.
1890 – Claus, Catherine & Charles Claus – Long Island, N. Y. (baby farmers)

1892 – Makin, Sarah & John Makin – Sydney, Australia – (baby farmers)

1893 – Meyer, Mary &  D. H. Meyer (Reuter, Mayler) – South Bend, In.

1906 – Holmen, Mrs. & Gustav Holmen – Stockholm, Sweden (baby farmers)
1908 – Herrera, Francesca & Molina – Seville, Spain

1921 – Kaneko & Husband – Tokyo Japan

1923 – Cooper, Martha & Daniel Cooper – Newlands, New Zealand (baby farmers)

1924 – Tanaka (wife of Jukichi) – Tokyo, Japan

1925 – Jackson, Pearl & Odell Jackson – Birmingham, Alabama

1939 – Creighton, Mary Frances & Everett Appelgate – Newark, N.J.

1945 – Young, Lila Gladys & William Y. – Halifax, N. C., Can, – (baby farmers)

1948 – Ishikawa, Miyuki & Takeshi Ishikawa – Tokyo, Japan – (baby farmers)

1951 – Beck, Martha Julie & Raymond Martinez Fernandez – Grand Rapids, Mi.

1958 – Fugate, Caril Ann &  Charles Raymond Starkweather – Lincoln, Ne.

1965 – Hindley, Myra &  Ian Duncan Brady – Hattersley, England

1969 – Lelièvre, Yvetta &  André Lelièvre – Saint-Pierre-lès-Nemours, France

1980 – Bundy, Carol Mary &  Douglas Daniel Clark – Los Angeles, Ca.

1980 – Gallego, Charlene (Williams) & Gerald Armand Gallego – Sacramento, Ca.

1980 – Wright, Blanche & Robert Young – New York, NY

1983 – Neelley, Judith Ann & Alvin Neeley – Fort Payne, Al.
1983 – Phillips, Charmaine  & Pieter Grundlingh – South Africa

1984 – Carson, Susan & James Michael Carson – San Francisco, Ca.

1985 – Lynch, Susan & Frederick Robert Klenner Jr. – Greensboro, North Carolina

1985 – Padgett, Ruby Carolyn &  Mitchell Carlton Sims – South Carolina, Calif.

1985 – West, Rosemary Pauline, West Frederick Walter – Gloucester, England

1986 – Birnie, Catherine & David Birnie – Willagee, Western A,  Australia

1986 – Coffman Cynthia Lynn & James Gregory Marlow – San Bernardino, Ca.

1989 – Aldrete, Sara (Villareal) &  Adolfo De Jesus Constanzo – Mexico City, Mex.

1989 – Copeland, Faye & Ray Copeland – Mooresville, Mo.

1989 – Graham, Gwendolyn Gail &, Catherine May Wood – Grand Rapids, Mi.

1989 – Watson, Mona Lisa & Michael Wayne Howell – Ala, Tenn., Okla.

1990 – Zaepfel, Leigh Ann & Carrion Christopher Alan – Oklahoma

1991 – Ruiz Villeda, Anna Maria &  Rudolfo Infante Jimenez – Matamoros, Mex.

1993 – Homolka,Karla & Paul Bernardo – Saint Catharines, Ont., Canada

1993 – King, Carolyn A., Martin Bradlyn A. – Lebanon County, Pa.

1999 – Hendy, Cindy & David Ray – Elephant Butte, N M  
2002 – Junko Ogata & Futoshi Matsunaga – Fukuoka, Kyodo, Japan

2002 – Sifrit, Erica & Benjamin Sifrit – Pennsylvania, Maryland

2002 – “Zhtomyr Serial Killer Couple” - Zhtomyr, Ukraine

2003 – Zhiqun, Duan & Ma Yong – Shenzhen, China
2004 – Knotek, Michelle & David Knotek – South Bend, Washington

2011 – Wells, Angela & Roland Wells – Peoria, Il. – 2

2012 – Grigsby, Holly & David "Joey" Pedersen – Wureka, Ca.
2012 – L., Lydia & Siggie S. – Germany

2012 – Oliveira da Silveira, Bruna & Jorge Negromonte da Silveira – Garanhuns, Brazil

2012 – Pires, Isabel Cristina & Jorge Negromonte da Silveira – Garanhuns, Brazil

***

►Brother & Sister

Springstein, Hernann & Auguste Bock –  Prenzlau, Germany – 1895

►Father & Daughter

Pandy, Ágnes & Andras Pandy – Brussels, Belgium – 1997

►Female Pair

Atherton, Bessie & Alice Marie Cramer – Peoria, Illinois – 1926

Gobay, Annie & Emma Kitchen – Atlanta, Ga. – 1903

Golay, Helen & Olga Rutterschmidt – Santa Monica, Ca. – 2008

Sach, Amelia & Annie Walters – London, England – 1903

Sammon, Mary & Jennie Layton – Camden, New Jersey – 1897         

►Mother & Son

Bejarano, Guadelupe Martinez de & Aurelio Bejarano – Mexico City, Mexico – 1892

De Melker, Daisy & Cecil Rhodes Cowle – Johannesburg, South Africa – 1932

Smith, Mary Eleanor (“Shoebox Annie”) & DeCastro EarlMayer – Washington – 1938

►Mother & Daughter

Tamarin, Ivanova & Olda – Kurdla, Estonia – 1912

Skoblinska, sister & daughter – Warsaw, Poland – 1890

Winters, Amelia & Elizabeth Frost – England – 1889

►Sisters & Sister

Abdel-al, Raya & Sakina – Alexandria, Egypt – 1920

Flannigan, Catherine, & Margaret Higgins – Liverpool, England – 1884

Olah, Suzi & Lydia Olah – Hungary – 1929
Skoblinska, sister & daughter – Warsaw, Poland – 1890

►Mistress & Servant

Jaeyer, Margaret & S. K. Rentner – Hohen Urach, Swabia (Germany) – 1835

***